Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peter King predicts the Super Bowl result


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

They are and have been for the last several years. Their only downfall has been QB play.

If CMC stays healthy (which I put at a 0% chance of happening) and wins comeback player of the year, this team makes the playoffs 

The thing that made NOLA dangerous was the HOF QB/Coach combo.  Neither of which are there.

Weve seen talented rosters with questionable QB/Coach and the word wasn’t “loaded”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NAS said:

Saints will never win with James Winston, the interception machine.

Exactly. But as I said in the NFCS thread their roster is still superior. So is their FO even with the losses. Though, I don’t think the get near the SB. And despite more echoing of Brady is old and will fall apart, I promise you he won’t. He will compete. We will look like trash agains him.

People who think Panthers have any chance are really delusional. The Falcons appear to be doing nothing substantial in areas that matter after failing to get Watson, but I suspect they planned for a suspension and we’re always tanking the right way anyways. Especially with money situation. I truly envy them. It’s what 2020 should have been for the Panthers.

Meanwhile the Panthers and their fans seem to love their 7/8 win mediocrity scratching and clawing, securing third place in the division and lose out yet again to a nice pick.

The Falcons will end up with their franchise QB by doing thngs right day 1 of a rebuild while per usual Panther fans will be screaming never surrender and tanking is for losers when playing playoff teams’ back ups and Rhule will get an unheard of 4th year and beyond because our owner is smarter then everyone else, charging full steam into the worst stretch of Panther history and solidifying this franchise as the modern Browns.

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Smithers said:

Neither of those teams will be in the nfc championship game.  What an awful prediction 

Packers lost Adams but gained a lot defensively and Rodgers is likely still able to play at his MVP level, I wouldn't bet against them being in the NFCCG. Don't see them winning it all but they've made the championship game 2 of the last 3 years and were very close last year too. 

 

Aints obviously ain't making it, King is drunk

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sorry, I cannot see the Saints getting to the NFC CG with Jameis Winston at QB, especially without Sean Payton.

Remember what the Saints were before Payton and Brees? They might be heading back there.

saints-fansjpg-5333390047b13c3d.jpg

I'm not saying that to talk poo. I full well know we basically currently reside there ourselves.

I predicted a huge drop for the saints, I think this is officially their crater, and I said that a while back and still believe it.  I think they do alright early, as season wears their vets break, they plateau, then crater at the end.  Basically they're the panthers 2019. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, onmyown said:

Exactly. But as I said in the NFCS thread their roster is still superior. So is their FO even with the losses. Though, I don’t think the get near the SB. And despite more echoing of Brady is old and will fall apart, I promise you he won’t. He will compete. We will look like trash agains him.

People who think Panthers have any chance are really delusional. The Falcons appear to be doing nothing substantial in areas that matter after failing to get Watson, but I suspect they planned for a suspension and we’re always tanking the right way anyways. Especially with money situation. I truly envy them. It’s what 2020 should have been for the Panthers.

Meanwhile the Panthers and their fans seem to love their 7/8 win mediocrity scratching and clawing, securing third place in the division and lose out yet again to a nice pick.

The Falcons will end up with their franchise QB by doing thngs right day 1 of a rebuild while per usual Panther fans will be screaming never surrender and tanking is for losers when playing playoff teams’ back ups and Rhule will get an unheard of 4th year and beyond because our owner is smarter then everyone else, charging full steam into the worst stretch of Panther history and solidifying this franchise as the modern Browns.

Tanking is for losers. Just look at your post. It just screams loser. It sounds like a loser wrote it. Anyway, which teams tanked and became Super Bowl contenders because of it? I honestly don't know, but off the top of my head I can't think of any that purposely tanked for a year and came out significantly better for it.

Maybe that's how the Bucs, Chiefs, Packers, Bills, Patriots, Steelers are/were always in the conversation as Super Bowl contenders over the last decade? Because they tanked for a year and look at them now. Idk. You tell me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Saints lost at least 2 key players. One was traded to Eagles and the other is involved with serious legal issues.

Kamara won't be suspended until 2023 season at earliest.  His legal team delayed , delayed, delayed so he can still play.

 

Losing Gardner-Johnson is a pretty big loss but that defense is pretty stacked.

 

The bigger question mark to me now is the offensive line.  They don't have Armstead anymore and Andrus Peat is awful.   No clue who is replacing Armstead either because their rookie tore his big toe ligament.  

Offense is talented at skill positions but I don't expect them to be a top 10 unit.

They will live and die by their defense.   I'd expect Carolina-NO to have a similar record at the end of the year.

 

   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, onmyown said:

Exactly. But as I said in the NFCS thread their roster is still superior. So is their FO even with the losses. Though, I don’t think the get near the SB. And despite more echoing of Brady is old and will fall apart, I promise you he won’t. He will compete. We will look like trash agains him.

People who think Panthers have any chance are really delusional. The Falcons appear to be doing nothing substantial in areas that matter after failing to get Watson, but I suspect they planned for a suspension and we’re always tanking the right way anyways. Especially with money situation. I truly envy them. It’s what 2020 should have been for the Panthers.

Meanwhile the Panthers and their fans seem to love their 7/8 win mediocrity scratching and clawing, securing third place in the division and lose out yet again to a nice pick.

The Falcons will end up with their franchise QB by doing thngs right day 1 of a rebuild while per usual Panther fans will be screaming never surrender and tanking is for losers when playing playoff teams’ back ups and Rhule will get an unheard of 4th year and beyond because our owner is smarter then everyone else, charging full steam into the worst stretch of Panther history and solidifying this franchise as the modern Browns.

Do you even like the Panthers? 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Carolina Cajun said:

I predicted a huge drop for the saints, I think this is officially their crater, and I said that a while back and still believe it.  I think they do alright early, as season wears their vets break, they plateau, then crater at the end.  Basically they're the panthers 2019. 

I think the Saints may benefit from being in the same division as the Falcons and Panthers, in fairness. That's 4 possible wins by just playing cellar dwelling teams.

TBD but even with their situation not being good, they are still in better shape than the Falcons and us(very unfortunately).

I just don't think I see two playoff berths coming from the South, even with that additional playoff spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...