Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peter King predicts the Super Bowl result


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

They are and have been for the last several years. Their only downfall has been QB play.

If CMC stays healthy (which I put at a 0% chance of happening) and wins comeback player of the year, this team makes the playoffs 

The thing that made NOLA dangerous was the HOF QB/Coach combo.  Neither of which are there.

Weve seen talented rosters with questionable QB/Coach and the word wasn’t “loaded”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NAS said:

Saints will never win with James Winston, the interception machine.

Exactly. But as I said in the NFCS thread their roster is still superior. So is their FO even with the losses. Though, I don’t think the get near the SB. And despite more echoing of Brady is old and will fall apart, I promise you he won’t. He will compete. We will look like trash agains him.

People who think Panthers have any chance are really delusional. The Falcons appear to be doing nothing substantial in areas that matter after failing to get Watson, but I suspect they planned for a suspension and we’re always tanking the right way anyways. Especially with money situation. I truly envy them. It’s what 2020 should have been for the Panthers.

Meanwhile the Panthers and their fans seem to love their 7/8 win mediocrity scratching and clawing, securing third place in the division and lose out yet again to a nice pick.

The Falcons will end up with their franchise QB by doing thngs right day 1 of a rebuild while per usual Panther fans will be screaming never surrender and tanking is for losers when playing playoff teams’ back ups and Rhule will get an unheard of 4th year and beyond because our owner is smarter then everyone else, charging full steam into the worst stretch of Panther history and solidifying this franchise as the modern Browns.

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Smithers said:

Neither of those teams will be in the nfc championship game.  What an awful prediction 

Packers lost Adams but gained a lot defensively and Rodgers is likely still able to play at his MVP level, I wouldn't bet against them being in the NFCCG. Don't see them winning it all but they've made the championship game 2 of the last 3 years and were very close last year too. 

 

Aints obviously ain't making it, King is drunk

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sorry, I cannot see the Saints getting to the NFC CG with Jameis Winston at QB, especially without Sean Payton.

Remember what the Saints were before Payton and Brees? They might be heading back there.

saints-fansjpg-5333390047b13c3d.jpg

I'm not saying that to talk poo. I full well know we basically currently reside there ourselves.

I predicted a huge drop for the saints, I think this is officially their crater, and I said that a while back and still believe it.  I think they do alright early, as season wears their vets break, they plateau, then crater at the end.  Basically they're the panthers 2019. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, onmyown said:

Exactly. But as I said in the NFCS thread their roster is still superior. So is their FO even with the losses. Though, I don’t think the get near the SB. And despite more echoing of Brady is old and will fall apart, I promise you he won’t. He will compete. We will look like trash agains him.

People who think Panthers have any chance are really delusional. The Falcons appear to be doing nothing substantial in areas that matter after failing to get Watson, but I suspect they planned for a suspension and we’re always tanking the right way anyways. Especially with money situation. I truly envy them. It’s what 2020 should have been for the Panthers.

Meanwhile the Panthers and their fans seem to love their 7/8 win mediocrity scratching and clawing, securing third place in the division and lose out yet again to a nice pick.

The Falcons will end up with their franchise QB by doing thngs right day 1 of a rebuild while per usual Panther fans will be screaming never surrender and tanking is for losers when playing playoff teams’ back ups and Rhule will get an unheard of 4th year and beyond because our owner is smarter then everyone else, charging full steam into the worst stretch of Panther history and solidifying this franchise as the modern Browns.

Tanking is for losers. Just look at your post. It just screams loser. It sounds like a loser wrote it. Anyway, which teams tanked and became Super Bowl contenders because of it? I honestly don't know, but off the top of my head I can't think of any that purposely tanked for a year and came out significantly better for it.

Maybe that's how the Bucs, Chiefs, Packers, Bills, Patriots, Steelers are/were always in the conversation as Super Bowl contenders over the last decade? Because they tanked for a year and look at them now. Idk. You tell me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Saints lost at least 2 key players. One was traded to Eagles and the other is involved with serious legal issues.

Kamara won't be suspended until 2023 season at earliest.  His legal team delayed , delayed, delayed so he can still play.

 

Losing Gardner-Johnson is a pretty big loss but that defense is pretty stacked.

 

The bigger question mark to me now is the offensive line.  They don't have Armstead anymore and Andrus Peat is awful.   No clue who is replacing Armstead either because their rookie tore his big toe ligament.  

Offense is talented at skill positions but I don't expect them to be a top 10 unit.

They will live and die by their defense.   I'd expect Carolina-NO to have a similar record at the end of the year.

 

   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, onmyown said:

Exactly. But as I said in the NFCS thread their roster is still superior. So is their FO even with the losses. Though, I don’t think the get near the SB. And despite more echoing of Brady is old and will fall apart, I promise you he won’t. He will compete. We will look like trash agains him.

People who think Panthers have any chance are really delusional. The Falcons appear to be doing nothing substantial in areas that matter after failing to get Watson, but I suspect they planned for a suspension and we’re always tanking the right way anyways. Especially with money situation. I truly envy them. It’s what 2020 should have been for the Panthers.

Meanwhile the Panthers and their fans seem to love their 7/8 win mediocrity scratching and clawing, securing third place in the division and lose out yet again to a nice pick.

The Falcons will end up with their franchise QB by doing thngs right day 1 of a rebuild while per usual Panther fans will be screaming never surrender and tanking is for losers when playing playoff teams’ back ups and Rhule will get an unheard of 4th year and beyond because our owner is smarter then everyone else, charging full steam into the worst stretch of Panther history and solidifying this franchise as the modern Browns.

Do you even like the Panthers? 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Carolina Cajun said:

I predicted a huge drop for the saints, I think this is officially their crater, and I said that a while back and still believe it.  I think they do alright early, as season wears their vets break, they plateau, then crater at the end.  Basically they're the panthers 2019. 

I think the Saints may benefit from being in the same division as the Falcons and Panthers, in fairness. That's 4 possible wins by just playing cellar dwelling teams.

TBD but even with their situation not being good, they are still in better shape than the Falcons and us(very unfortunately).

I just don't think I see two playoff berths coming from the South, even with that additional playoff spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have seen little inclination that they are laying down on him, that I can agree with. I don't think we are going to ever see much in the way of unfiltered opinions in the public realm from his teammates because that's extremely rare and extremely toxic behavior.  It's certainly a positive thing that they support him but, again, that doesn't make a successful NFL starting QB. Playing well on Sunday's does.  That is what has been lacking to date. He is not playing well consistently enough to be considered an NFL starting QB. He has to improve there. Be more consistent. Be more decisive. Make correct decisions more frequently. 
    • That's fine but for every Kurt Warner there are 10 Tony Banks that don't find their spot because....it never really existed.  Jake Browning was on and off practice squad teams for years until he stuck in Cincy. In his limited action over the past two seasons, he has played well enough that the Bengals panic traded for 41 year old Joe Flacco. It's easy to point to outliers like Warner or Purdy or Tom Brady as players who fell through the cracks because....well, they are outliers. The statistics over the long term have never really borne out the argument that every QB is just waiting for their perfect spot and situation. Most of these guys bounce around the league and it just never really clicks anywhere or they become marginal backup QB's. I don't think that exactly an accident. It's tough to be a starting NFL QB and it's why the hunt every offseason is so frantic. There are just so few that do it at a high level. My guess is that a theoretical market for Bryce Young(today) is going to look a lot like that post Chicago Justin Fields market. Not a lot of interest and a late round pick value at the highest. And a lot of that IS going to be his average to below average physical traits. It's extremely tough to be in that range and excel in the NFL. And it's precisely because you DO have to be closer to perfection to make up for the fact that you can't do a lot of the things that the elite to above average starters in this league do. 
    • Im never not impressed by how confidently wrong you are. I've watched probably 200 NFL QBs play live. This talk about Bryce's arm strength is retarded, pure and simple. Bryce can make every throw an NFL QB needs to make in any circumstance. Does he have an arm that makes you go wow all the time? No, but very few QBs truly do. Bryce has plenty of zip on the ball when he wants. That TD to XL was a frozen rope. He throws to the opposite hash and outside all the time with no problem. Bryce's arm is objectively stronger than Cam's post-injury. I've seen both live multiple times and I know. And Cam could still play QB well without his rocket launcher. OPs point remains. QB success relies on a lot of nebulous things. Obviously you dont like Bryce. But his success is not going to be bc he doesn't have the arm strength. Its embarrassing this is a thing. Go to some games and actually educate yourself.  
×
×
  • Create New...