Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stat of the Day


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

54 total rushing yards - the fewest yards on the ground of the entire Matt Rhule era.  

*and we had a fully healthy roster/CMC

#rockstarOC

Rhule should be fired simply for the poo game plan he came out with in the 1rst qt.  Forget the refs, forget Bakers shitty play, forget our run defense.  It was the jaw dropping lack of planning to start the game was the reason we lost.  How the fug are we that inept?

 

And the schedule only gets harder and no more jaboby brissettes of the world missing wide open players

 

Thinking 4/5 wins is our max after week 1

  • Pie 8
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

54 total rushing yards - the fewest yards on the ground of the entire Matt Rhule era.  

*and we had a fully healthy roster/CMC

#rockstarOC

We only had 11 at halftime, so we really really really turned up the heat in the second half 🤣

I think one of those runs was when we had a bad snap from center ( yeah, I know, shocking ) and CMC, picked it up off the ground and had a long run.  Busted play. 
 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inexcusable ineptitude and it all starts with the head coach. You can change the OC you can change the QB but the same putrid offensive struggles and poor oline play persist. Who is running the show? But it's all the refs and the leagues fault because they hate us and want us to fail 🙄🥱

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Daeavorn said:

Our next 4 games  Are really difficult as well. Next week is the giants and then after that are the saints. I can absolutely see us losing to both of them. 

 

Then after that we have cardinals and 49ers

 I think we'll be lucky to have one win

Cardinals looked like poo, the saints ain’t amazing and hopefully it’s pouring rain when we play the 49ers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will win some games but yeah it is that bad. The Rhule implosion begins. Soon the chants start. The media will be ruthless to the weakest to pick on in the 24 hour cycle for entertainment. Rhule is in for a rough ride. Mirroring that 3rd year in school really isn’t happening.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After a day to sit on it, I still can’t get over we had Elflein out there with a routine practice issue wasn’t addressed—I mean, there’s no way in hell the snap issues weren’t apparent in practice. Tecklenberg would have been an upgrade. 

And then playcalling on both sides of the ball was the worst I’ve seen since maybe ever. Such poor game planning. I truly dont think the big issue being coaching has ever been more noticeable. This was bad.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Varking said:

I wouldn't judge too much off of week 1, honestly. With the way the new NFL is with one less preseason game, how little most starters play in preseason, most teams looked very sloppy in week 1. 

who knows.  week 1 and early in the season has generally been the best Matt Rhule's teams have looked during his tenure.  It generally gets worse the longer teams get tape on his teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Daeavorn said:

Our next 4 games  Are really difficult as well. Next week is the giants and then after that are the saints. I can absolutely see us losing to both of them. 

 

Then after that we have cardinals and 49ers

 I think we'll be lucky to have one win

I disagree that any of these 4 games are difficult. Other than Murray none of these teams have QBs better than Brissett and the rest of their rosters are not as good as the Browns. 

 

That said I don't have much hope of winning these games the way we embarrassed ourselves yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TAMU had such a weird draft. Usually you'd be bragging your ass off about three DL drafted in the top two rounds except that the narrative around all three was about how badly they were misused by TAMU. LOL
    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that want a little more: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
×
×
  • Create New...