Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker had a perfect QB rating in the 4th quarter


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

blindly pessimistic?   Hmmm, interesting choice of words

What I mean by that, is disregarding anything good, (in this case) to the point where we pretend a perfect qb rating in the 4th quarter is irrelevant, and people literally not giving Baker credit for a 70 yard TD to Anderson, when we haven’t seen a throw that accurate since Ginn was on the team. 
 

It’s a game if W’s vs L’s, I get it that, but people pretend good things literally didn’t happen, or they create a narrative that feeds their pity pout session, and it’s silly. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Thats because their qb missed a ton of open throws.  It probably should have been a 3 score game in the 2nd qt.   I doubt we see that much qb incompetence as we move into the meat of our schedule. 

If our o-line didn't miss their blocks, and Baker didn't miss a wide open Shi Smith and throw that interception, and Matt Rhule didn't miss half of his brain on gameday, and the refs didn't miss that intentional grounding call, and our defense didn't miss all those tackles, then we would've won by at least 795 points.  (Am I doing this right?)  

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping he can build on that going into the next game but I don't have much confidence in the gameplans of our coaching staff. They better figure out something because if we start out slow and awful again they're going to blink a few times and Barkley will have put up 100 yards on our defense already.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...