-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
Well they guy has war paint on while he watches the game on his computer so that might explain it a little -
By Bear Hands · Posted
The draft investment is even more critical than FAs, so it's misleading to, well say 'its misleading because they didn't work out' and the positional salary allocation matters. You invest highly in a draft with the expectation/timeline of a second contract in the near future. So it directly relates to positional allocation. Unless you're stuck with an imbecile GM. Skill Positions: 2025: R1 WR, R4 RB, R5 TE, R6 WR 2024: R1 WR, R2 RB, R4 TE 2023: R2 WR Since picking him at 1, we've drafted 4 wideouts, 2 RBs, 2 TEs. Also factor in bringing in Coker (UDFA), Dowdle, & Thielen. Not to mention trying Diontae. We've done plenty. Also factor in that FAs kind maybe of have a say where they want to go. You can play the game with wishing we drafted someone else, but you can't say the framework wasn't sound. It was, we've just done poorly in choosing the talent to bring together. -
.thumb.png.95081122e4abddeced8c59a56cb2241a.png)
By HaricotVert · Posted
I dont think I can take much more of Schlereth. FML that dude is annoying
-
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.