Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule vs NFL coaches


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Allen took some massive shots yesterday but I dont know if you watched Balt but holy poo Jackson is instigating hits now like cam used to and that poo isnt going to last at all

Not good for Jackson. Cam broke and he was a beast. That guy needs to follow R Willion's example or he will be ruined too soon into his megadeal that he is seeking...if he makes it there playing like that this year. 

I was talking about their poo coach. Watson at QB is bad but inured Watson at QB is so much worse. Yesterday was such a turd they layed on the field. I think they had 1 possession that looked competent and it fell apart the rest of the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

How embarrassing for Klingsbury. Imagine being owned by Matt Rhule. That may be a talking point when Kliff eventually gets shitcanned.

I remember when it went from conversation about him being fired to him getting a big extension.

The Cardinals are definitely a horribly run organization.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I remember when it went from conversation about him being fired to him getting a big extension.

The Cardinals are definitely a horribly run organization.

That's what many here do not understand, as it relates to NFL owners.Most of these groups are ruthless business types, that have fortes in making money, not necessarily running football teams. Mike Bidwell in AZ is  prime example.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 3838 said:

That's what many here do not understand, as it relates to NFL owners.Most of these groups are ruthless business types, that have fortes in making money, not necessarily running football teams. Mike Bidwell in AZ is  prime example.

The Brown family in Cincinnati too...

As I recall, there was talk of forcing them to sell the team a few years back.

(part of me wonders if Tepper will get to that point down the road)

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

I’m rooting for Jacksonville this year in hopes of Tepper seeing just how much coaching matters and how quickly you can turn a team around

 

21 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Miami's not exactly a bad example either

I'm not sure how much embarrassment he can take but those two teams are making a fool out of Tepper for keeping a loser coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

FYI: The rookie coach we lost to a week ago lost last night to a Cowboys team led by a backup.

There's probably a thread to be made about games we lost that we probably shouldn't have but I'm not gonna do it right this moment.

I’ll give you credit… when you set an agenda, you work tirelessly to make apples into oranges. I think pretty much everyone is in a agreement about Rhule, there’s hundreds of threads saying the same sh1t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...