Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The crazy thing is we would be 3-0 with Cam Newton


OneBadCat
 Share

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Forget this year, I’m 100% convinced that if Hurney had his way we would have kept Cam on the final year of his contract, not signed Bridgewater, and in turn traded up for Justin Herbert. The effects of the fat fool will be felt for generations.

Hurney and Rivera were reported to have been ready to offer Newton a big extension.

David Tepper nixed the idea.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:
1 hour ago, WUnderhill said:

if Hurney had his way we would have kept Cam on the final year of his contract, not signed Bridgewater, and in turn traded up for Justin Herbert. The effects of the fat fool will be felt for generations.

Hurney and Rivera were reported to have been ready t

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Hurney and Rivera were reported to have been ready to offer Newton a big extension.

David Tepper nixed the idea.

And Hurney reportedly loved Herbert. Too bad Brady and Rhule reportedly loved Bridgewater and went into the draft thinking we had a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team and staff are so mediocre it has cost us the last 3 seasons and at least two more once they’re removed…..we did the opposite of what winning franchises do and the proof is clear, I knew when we released cam with no plan in place, in favor of a first time hc we were doomed. 
 

premarure post cam has been some of worst football this team has displayed in decades 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not if Rhule and McAdoo are the coaches. 

if you invented some magic world where Cam was here and we had the same roster and a different staff? We probably have a better record.  A good staff would basically have run Cam and CMC 40 times a game.  And that wins more than 1 game.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow you guys are still around? uh yea no cam is trash now and no team is interested in him for that reason same with baker. should’ve rolled over that 6m from last year too what a fuging waste, but I’m sure Tepper made y’all fall for it and tune in lmao

dont be stupid 

and let’s not do the whole but but cam is waiting for that perfect situation; HE’S the one turning down teams lol…you stans crack me up

Edited by onmyown
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OneBadCat said:

Just proof that egos run the NFL. 
 

You can’t tell me that Cam wouldn’t fair better than this. Hell he already did after being signed off his couch. 
 

All of our passes are PA and rollouts because Baker can’t throw over singleback formation without being batted down. 

Cam would at least be keeping this defense fresh with automatic 3rd/4th and short conversions.

The line is significantly better than last year. Cam would have feasted. But  Rhule is determined to outsmart himself out of a job for some reason.

 

Moreover Cam was cool and collected and made the right reads more often than not. Cam also has the swag and clutch factor. Darnold is a chicken poo and Baker is a nervous train wreck guessing whether it’s okay the throw ball because of his height .

Give me all the poo because I’m still right. We keep assembling rosters that Cam would have succeeded with and Rhule continues to think he knows better. 

Hell last week we ran RPO all game like Baker is some kind of duel threat. None of this poo makes sense. 

Let. It. Go.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No we wouldn't, but you guys keep up that active imagination.  Cam couldn't win with the Patriots, couldn't win with us last year, and is sitting on the couch at home this year because no one wants him.  

He can't throw the ball well anymore.  Hasn't been able to in several years.  Unless he becomes a backup somewhere, he is done.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He was a project coming out of college and seeing that he doesn’t care much he won’t make it IMO
    • My very UNPOPULAR opinion:   First, I would want to know the locker room.  Have they turned on Canales?  If not, I would stay with him.  Here is why: Switching coaches every year or two is not the answer to long term success.  We are chasing hope instead of building a program around a young coach.  There were not many applicants for this job and if you think they are suddenly dying to be here now, that MIGHT justify a coaching change Canales has made some tough decisions (like benching Bryce), but his weaknesses (the team's weaknesses) have been in the areas in which we have neglected or sucked for years.  Who did we get for CMC?  Who made the trade with the Bears when we had no idea at the time who we wanted?  Who drafted Mingo, Marshall, XL, etc.?  Who signed a frequently-injured CB to the biggest contract in NFL history at the time for a CB?  I look at the personnel decisions and the play calling.  Our edge players are injured and not that good when healthy. He played Johnson because he had nothing left.  Johnson was terrible Sunday.  He has nothing at LB and two starting OL are now out.  XL is pouting because he does not seem to have paid the price to be paid the price of a first round pick.  AT was sent packing.  Bryce's resurgence last year may have been Canales and not Bryce. Evero still does not have the tools he needs to succeed--on the field or perhaps between his ears.   If Canales fires Evero, he is probably doing the right thing.  Remember, we had a lot of money in dead cap when Canales took over.  Fitterer was the worst GM since Matt Millen in the NFL, and we have sucked recently in the first round of the draft (Bryce, XL) until this season.   When the GM is trying to give the coach what he needs to be successful and you keep changing coaches, it is difficult.   I think this--stay with Canales, but bring in a veteran DC.  Some argue that Canales needs to move on from Bryce, but this team is not set up to give him options.  Andy aint the answer.  We never seem to take the PS QB seriously--all eggs are in one basket.  Canales needs options. This team needs to address the QB situation.  Bryce's best games are not Lombardi worthy, so move on.  He is not the Alpha a young coach needs on the field.  Give him options at QB, some LBs and a good coordinator on defense, and I think we could use another stud WR.  It is time to start drafting developmental OL and start grooming them to replace our aging OL. This draft is solid at QB as it stands now.  We need to focus on drafting the right guy and signing a veteran backup who is not the starting QB's BFF.  Compete.  Heck, i have no problem doing what Cleveland did--draft a QB in round 1 and then another QB if one falls into day 3.   I think we need stability and I am not confident any respectable coach comes to Carolina.  Canales is frustrated, but the front office has failed him, as have injuries, and a really bad draft a few years ago that brought them Bryce.  He was hired to fix Bryce--so I say neuter him so he does not sire any more 5'8" QBs.   Canales is better that Rivera was--Canales just has so much less talent.  Rivera was coach of the year a few times because he had Cam Newton, but could never put two winning seasons together.  That is a crime.
×
×
  • Create New...