Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trust me a Tepper is wanting a change

54th man

By 54th man,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

54th man Enthusiast

54th man

Posted
Posted

But a plan has to unfold. If he fires Rhule who does he replace him with in season? Sure Wilks would work but if he can get anything out of this team will it interline him from hiring his next head coach, someone who might not be on the horizon till some smoke clears for whatever reason that may be. And our offense will still be stagnant cause we have McAdoodoo. As bad as Rhule needs to be fired a plan has to be worked out. When your front door blows off during a hurricane u don't rush out during the storm to replace it u wait till the storm has blown thru then take action. GOD THIS TEAM is enept

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
X-Clown Mentor

X-Clown

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Honestly, I don't care what the plan is for the rest of the season. The sooner they can get Rhule's stench off of the players and the franchise, the better. Let the players and remaining coaches audition for their jobs next year. What's the worst that can happen? We lose more games?

  • Pie 14
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

We were told that Tepper had a "plan" when he was telling everybody it might take five years or more to rebuild.

Then the team kept making moves that were about winning now instead of building for the long term.

I'm not convinced David Tepper would know a good plan if one ran up and bit him on the ass.

  • Pie 20
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TNPanther Rising Star

TNPanther

Posted
Posted (edited)

Tepper seems to me like an extremely impatient prick who is impossible to work for, hence the resignations of two presidents of his org.

Was talking to a guy at the Riot tailgate yesterday who told me about the construction ordeal in Rock Hill. Apparently Tepper wanted more money from the state/county and when he didn't get what he wanted he just pulled out of the deal in the middle of the night. Ultimately sunk the construction company into bankruptcy. There are a lot of people in SC who hate his guts.

 

Edited by TNPanther
  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cam Lawter Mentor

Cam Lawter

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, TNPanther said:

Tepper seems to me like an extremely impatient prick who is impossible to work for, hence the resignations of two presidents of his org.

Was talking to a guy at the Riot tailgate yesterday who told me about the construction ordeal in Rock Hill. Apparently Tepper wanted more money from the state/county and when he didn't get what he wanted he just pulled out of the deal in the middle of the night. Ultimately sunk the construction company into bankruptcy. There are a lot of people in SC who hate his guts.

 

Wait? How did the construction company go bankrupt because Tepper pulled out? Do they still not owe the company for the work and labor they started? If that's true, that some real scumbag poo coming from a multi-billionaire. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Prowler2k18 Grand Master

Prowler2k18

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

We were told that Tepper had a "plan" when he was telling everybody it might take five years or more to rebuild.

Then the team kept making moves that were about winning now instead of building for the long term.

I'm not convinced David Tepper would know a good plan if one ran up and bit him on the ass.

This is what I take the most issue with. Tepper already put it out there that this was going to be a long-term rebuild and asked the fans for patience. We even had COVID during Rhule’s 1st season as an added reprieve. And what have we seen? A revolving door of reclamation projects at QB, loss of draft capital for multiple acquisitions that have yet to pan out, to name a few missteps, and a trend in the wrong direction. What happened to the “plan”? This team and organization is an enigma!

Edited by Prowler2k18
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ThPantherFan Grand Master

ThPantherFan

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, 54th man said:

But a plan has to unfold. If he fires Rhule who does he replace him with in season? Sure Wilks would work but if he can get anything out of this team will it interline him from hiring his next head coach, someone who might not be on the horizon till some smoke clears for whatever reason that may be. And our offense will still be stagnant cause we have McAdoodoo. As bad as Rhule needs to be fired a plan has to be worked out. When your front door blows off during a hurricane u don't rush out during the storm to replace it u wait till the storm has blown thru then take action. GOD THIS TEAM is enept

This doesn't make any sense.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...