Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MATT RHULE FIRED


NJPanthers12
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, stbugs said:

Wilks was 3-13 in the only year as HC and guess what, Arizona had the #1 pick and got Murray.

I still like our chances for the top pick and a QB.

In all fairness to Wilks, I didn't really think he go a fair shake... Regardless, I do think they will go a different route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the idea of having an interim coach a lot more than I like the idea of Rhule going down with the ship.

An interim coach can do whatever the fug he wants, because he's always got the built in excuse that he inherited the team and the personnel.

If Rhule finishes out the season, he has to at least pretend he's still the Panthers coach of the future. So he can't change the personnel around too much, he can't change the gameplan too much, because he can't admit any mistakes.

Wilkes steps in, it doesn't hurt him to start Darnold over Baker. Hell, it doesn't hurt him to start PJ over either! It's not his team, it's not egg on his face, and in all likelihood, he won't be with the team next year.

So go nuts! Open up the last page of the playbook. Start the backup Center. Put the Punter in at Wide Receiver. Let's see what talent we've got on this team. And who knows? Without the burden of acting like Rhule's process was "so close" and was about to start working week over week, we might actually shake things up to looking halfway competitive!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

😂 Rhule sucked but do they really have to cherry pick it so much to avoid the 3-0 start last year. I mean how many other stats are from random weeks last year? Second half stats, why not, but in the first 5 games of this year and last 13 of last year? It’s not even a 16 or 17 game season.

Glad he’s gone but damn CBS you don’t have to get creative to show how bad he was.

media gonna media. It's pathetic bc there are people who see that and think "oh wow... good call out CBS. Thank you for the valuabel information." and then walk away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

😂 Rhule sucked but do they really have to cherry pick it so much to avoid the 3-0 start last year. I mean how many other stats are from random weeks last year? Second half stats, why not, but in the first 5 games of this year and last 13 of last year? It’s not even a 16 or 17 game season.

Glad he’s gone but damn CBS you don’t have to get creative to show how bad he was.

We still have the worst record since the halfway mark last year (week 9)

We have won 2 games in that timeframe. 

It's not any better, it just takes away more losses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...