Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC Trade Grades


UNCrules2187
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

You swing and miss sometimes. It happens. We needed picks and to get rid of that contract. 

Yeah.  I'm ok with it and think it is good compensation.  Like anything you have to sell, you want to get more out of it, but I think it's a good deal if you can make some of those picks work and draft well.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All these writers and analysts talking about us needing to make a trade or somehow move around to draft one of the big 3 QBs coming out this year.....as if we're not by far the worst team in the NFL and will almost 100% have one of the top 2 picks in the draft. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When is the last time we got a decent haul for any of our star players who were aging out or on a bad team staring down a rebuild? I can't remember anything significant. I feel encouraged that Fitterer is out there making things happen, and that Tepper has given him the freedom to do so. 

I'm happy for CMC. I don't think he's going to pull a Matt Stafford and win a SB with SF, but he'll be near his family and friends, and he'll be on a team that's competitive during his remaining prime years. I hope he breaks all kinds of records NEXT season, AFTER we've spent their 2023 draft picks. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kentucky Panther said:

You swing and miss sometimes. It happens. We needed picks and to get rid of that contract. 

That was a very predictable bad trade.

This trade was just making the best of an initial mistake(CMC contract) and the fact that you had a competitive player that wanted to go win somewhere.

I was actually shocked we got the haul we did for him. 

  • Pie 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact is (as usual), some Huddlers were way overrating what was considered an acceptable return for CMC. A first rounder was not especially realistic given the teams that really wanted him and thought that he could put them over the top. That being said, we got decent compensation that allows us a measure of maneuverability and flexibility if we so choose. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

The fact is (as usual), some Huddlers were way overrating what was considered an acceptable return for CMC. A first rounder was not especially realistic given the teams that really wanted him and thought that he could put them over the top. That being said, we got decent compensation that allows us a measure of maneuverability and flexibility if we so choose. 

I think some Huddlers are as mistaken as our organization has been for years in regards to NFL RB open market value. 

This was a great return. Never gonna be able to replace what CMC's beings to the table but he wasn't in a position to help make us successful in our current state.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LegioX said:

I hate to see CMC go, but it was a great pickup. We need to horde all the draft picks we can muster for the new HC.

Draft picks in quantity does not guarantee we can get any top players that will transition to the NFL and become stars. 

Edited by PantherOnTheProwl1523
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think some Huddlers are as mistaken as our organization has been for years in regards to NFL RB open market value. 

This was a great return. Never gonna be able to replace what CMC's beings to the table but he wasn't in a position to help make us successful in our current state.

This team does get high impact players from time to time Like JStew and CMC but it seems like a once in a blue moon thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, trueblade said:

I was high on Peters as well. But are these moves more him or Lynch?

No idea but it's not a great move for them IMO. They went hard for a QB and it's not going well. This just feels like doubling down or someone is sitting on a hot seat. Just feels weird and off to me on their end.

Guilt by association is  real thing and those people are going to have to answer for their moves and why they are not doing better than they are at the end of the year. Just getting into the playoffs isn't enough for that crew anymore.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Mays has a market, which it seems he will, he's gone.  I think we bring back Nijman for too much money to be cautious at LT, Corbett comes back cheap since he's already said he wants to live in CLT, and Christensen eventually gets re-signed with the hopes he can be depth at some point.  Draft an OT, draft a C. The OL might be rough for stretches next year, but time to get some youth there to prepare for Bryce in 2027 or the next QB. I still think we compete for the division in 2026 and can go back to the playoffs unlike the oddsmakers in Vegas, but the *real* year is 2027 IMO. Either Bryce has proven it and he's the QB looking at his 2nd contract, or we have the ready-made team for the next rookie QB or Vet we trade for. 
    • The Panthers are going to have a lot more flexibility in free agency than it looks like at first glance. On paper, the cap space might seem tight, but there are several obvious restructure candidates that could easily free up significant room. Between converting base salaries into signing bonuses and spreading cap hits out over future years, Carolina could realistically clear $60–80 million in additional space if they wanted to be aggressive. That kind of flexibility means they’re not stuck. They can extend key young pieces, add help along the offensive line, upgrade the defense, and still be strategic about value signings. Letting Cade Mays test the market makes sense from a leverage standpoint. If he’s willing to come back on a team-friendly deal, great, continuity on the line matters. But if his market price climbs, the Panthers should absolutely explore upgrades. The point is, this front office isn’t boxed in. With cap maneuvering and smart structuring, they have the ability to be active players in free agency rather than sitting on the sidelines like we are used too. 
×
×
  • Create New...