Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CJ Stroud


Vox
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

It's a fair debate. But the counter would be that he could be ahead in his development. It's not like a team wouldn't have used a top 10 for  Kurt Warner's career that effectively started at 28.

That’s what a team will be hoping for, but I’d bet most teams in the top 10 probably wouldn’t risk it, maybe a team picking in the teens might though.

Hypothetically, if a team like Atlanta or Seattle happens to over preform this year and are sitting around #18, I wouldn’t be totally shocked to see Hooker go early (assuming Levis is already gone).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

If he plays like he's been playing he's going way ahead of 18 IMO.  He's already being talked about as potentially top QB prospect.

I think he’d have to put up Burrow numbers for that to happen. At 25, he’ll be the second oldest QB since 1967 to be drafted in the first round (assuming he is).

Edit: he would be the third oldest because the numbers are based on the individuals birthday as of 9/1.

I see him going right around where Pickett was taken.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stroud's placement is elite, there is no disputing that, WRs open or not, his ball placement is ridiculous.  Anyone saying otherwise is just not being honest or not watching OSU games.  It is possible to parse out the skill even in a relatively handicapped offense.

Not trying to rely too much on O'Sullivan but his videos show the plays you're looking for...good lord look at the fly route at the :50 mark.  He breaks it down as well quite well.  

Here's also a new upload that breaks down Bryce v. Stroud

I'd just advise those who have only watched highlights so far to tune into an OSU game.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

I've been saying he's the best of this class. I really really really like Levis but that speaks more to the class as a whole not being special.

I'm really going to have to see more from everyone for the remainder of the season, and study scouting reports before I come to a conclusion. I like some things that I've seen from Levis and Levis  (but NOT enough to say they are any better of a prospect than Corral, I might add).

Hooker looked impressive from what I saw last week.

Edited by top dawg
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Back to back bad throws and 2 dropped picks vs Iowa.

Lol pass on Stroud

C’mon man… the second one was fine throw and the type of throw that NFL QB’s make every day, the receiver has to get his head around.

Trolling over two throws is fugging foolish.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Snake said:

It doesn't concern me as much as not being able to see over your line. I swear youngtards will try anything to make their guy look better. 

This is so stupid lmao. People act like Alabama’s O-Line and the SEC D’s they play have 6’1 linemen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
    • Fees nowadays are ridiculous. After purchasing concert tickets for my son’s 18th birthday and paying the rest of our HHI trip with 3 other families, I’m shocked at how much they are. Honestly, it’s grand theft. Some is taxes but in a world where everything is electronic, fees should be cheaper. Electrons don’t cost 10-30% of the event.
×
×
  • Create New...