Offers for Burns

[joande]

I think it needs to be at least three 1st rounders because it is sooooooo hard to find a premium DE.  We had hard time finding one after JP. 

[*FreeFua*]

I’m open to dealing literally anyone but you cannot miss if you’re going to deal Burns.

If Philly doesn’t include the Saints 1st rounder I hang up. It’s two 1st rounder + imo

Then there’s the whole we’ll have to hit on a pass rusher in the draft bit of this equation too. 

[JawnyBlaze]

2 minutes ago, joande said:

I think it needs to be at least three 1st rounders because it is sooooooo hard to find a premium DE.  We had hard time finding one after JP. 

Charles Johnson and Greg Hardy were premium DEs, but I don’t disagree with the sentiment. They are hard to find. 

[Jon Snow]

What is a 3-4 outside LB worth these days?

[Mr. Scot]

To be clear, he is not being shopped. Teams are calling.

[Captain Morgan]

10 minutes ago, Killah_Ray said:

This is one that could go either way. Because he hasn’t signed an extension yet has he?

 

no.  and this is a sticking point...if his agent tells us he doesn't want to be part of hte rebuild, unknown coach coming in, and he'd be reluctant to sign with us....we'd have to think about it seriously

[Tbe]

I could see dealing him if we needed capital to trade up for a QB.

That is not going to be a need though.

 

[Pantha-kun]

19 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

If the Eagles sent both their firsts this year see ya Burnsy 

Any deal for one player that includes multiple first and that player isn't your franchise QB? You take that deal and RUN away with that poo

[PNW_PantherMan]

For 2 firsts and some change, I think you gotta at least consider trading him.  That is a haul.

[Riverboat Ron]

19 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

If the Eagles sent both their firsts this year see ya Burnsy 

Imagine getting both the Eagles picks in 2023. One of them is that Saints pick and if they were to suck as bad as they look we might end up with a 1 and 2 of CJ Stroud and Will Anderson.

[TheRumGone]

6 minutes ago, Tbe said:

I could see dealing him if we needed capital to trade up for a QB.

That is not going to be a need though.

 

It makes sense if you don’t wanna pay him and start young again at the position. Big risk you don’t hit though. 

[TheRumGone]

Could definitely see the eagles doing it out of all the teams. They’re undefeated and can make a run. Need a pass rush to stop the afc opponent in the Super Bowl. Pairing him with Hassan again that’s a nasty pass rush. 
 

[Tbe]

2 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

It makes sense if you don’t wanna pay him and start young again at the position. Big risk you don’t hit though. 

That’s true as well. If he doesn’t want to be here or we don’t want to be the highest bidder.

[LinvilleGorge]

2 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

It makes sense if you don’t wanna pay him and start young again at the position. Big risk you don’t hit though. 

This. The key positions are QB, pass rusher, OT, WR, CB, and DT. That's just IMO. We have some pretty damn good players at all of those positions except for QB. Deal Burns though and now you're devoid of talent at two of those key spots. Not to mention still having needs among those positions. We still need to find an edge opposite of Burns. A long-term DT beside Brown. A running mate opposite Moore. We have enough needs that moving Burns has to net a MASSIVE haul. Someone would have to come with more than "good" value. We need to commit highway robbery on someone to rationalize the move.