Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dolphins extend Chubb


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

Draft picks value decrease as well. Essentially the Rams offered us a 2nd and a 3rd. And depending on where that team is....in the future....those picks could be a late 2nd and late 3rd. Would have been moronic to take those "1st's". The coach after our next coach would have loved to have them I guess.

 

As an asset used in making trades. A 1st down the line depreciates.

 

As an actual draft pick. A 1st down the line is still a 1st rounder. 

 

In case that was a clerical error, or brain fart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Thanks to the franchise tag, we will always have the leverage. Declining the trade does not provide any leverage to burns. I’m actually interested in how you think us not trading creates “leverage” for burns 

I've said in another post that Burns needs to stay here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I have said before why not let the new coach and hopefully GM decide? He’s on track for a record year for him so his value is not going anywhere…will be more attractive for top HC candidates for as well I’m sure.

Don’t have to tag him until 2024…just wait, plenty of time. I know he wants a new contract but that won’t be effected either way time wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gerry Green said:

 

As an asset used in making trades. A 1st down the line depreciates.

 

As an actual draft pick. A 1st down the line is still a 1st rounder. 

 

In case that was a clerical error, or brain fart. 

I was speaking straight from a trade negotiation standpoint. The front office was looking at a 2nd a 3rd equivalent. All front offices use trade charts and that's how they would have weighed this offer.

Edited by Luciu5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

I was speaking straight from a trade negotiation standpoint. The front office was looking at a 2nd a 3rd equivalent. All front offices use trade charts and that's how they would have weighed this offer.

 

Gotcha. I was just spinning it so it slanted to my favor. Yeah, that's the ticket,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think many are looking at draft “value” incorrectly. Here’s why….

If we make the trade next year this time for the Rams 1st rounders in ‘24 & ‘25, many would applaud the move because it’s the “current” year’s first. 

Reality is if you make the trade now, you can take advantage of the devalued future picks by asking for more compensation. A 2023 3rd or 4th rounder, for example. You should use those perceptions to work in your favor by acquiring more now.

——————
Assets the same now versus a year from now:

2024 1st and 2025 1st

 

Pros to trading now:

Acquire more draft capital or a player in exchange for the “devalued future picks” 

 

Pros to making the trade a year from now:

Another year of Burns playing DE for the Panthers.

——————

It’s the same picks now vs a year from now. You can’t say it’s a good trade then, but bad now. If you’re going to make the trade, you absolutely do it now to cash in more. We’re a couple years out from making a run, so the additional games from Burns isn’t an asset to me unless you plan to extend him. 
 

It seems obvious we’ve decided he’s going to be the cornerstone of our defense over the next 5-10 years. Hopefully he’s worth it. I think he can be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The good news is that we are pretty uniquely well established to address all of our needs this season. We have $14m real cap space, and something like $40m in trade deadline cap space. Not sure exactly how that works out. But, we have the room to absorb any bad contracts. With recent rule changes regarding retention, that went into effect this season, we now have a huge advantage in the trade market.  On top of that, while we do have obvious needs, we also have a glut of talent in certain areas that we struggle to find ice time for. We are over-stocked on scrappy talented lil-guys, strong defensively sound 3rd liners and shutdown left shot dmen. Whether it's a package or separate deals, idk. But, one of each from Stank/Blake/Nads, Erob/Carrier/KK/Jank, and Walker/Nystrom; throw in some 1st round picks (and frankly any other prospects they want) and we should be able to come out with a 1b to pair with Bussi and either a 2c with size or a 2c and size.   TL/DR We got the money, you got the stuff?
    • I don’t  think 6’4 was ever considered small or undersized. Baby hands tho, yes that was his thing That’s an interesting idea, like an optical illusion? Sounds like you have personal experience with this! 
    • in the 25' draft the Carolina Panthers had hired Brandt Tillis someone who actually understood how to build a successful team & build through the draft .  this team was yes mismanaged for years prior to Brandt Tillis joining the team in 25' & rarely done anything right in the draft outside occaionaly getting lucky on an UDFA such as Jalen Coker who's dad coincidentally happened to be a huge Carolina Panthers fan, hint hint  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...