Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dolphins extend Chubb

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

Draft picks value decrease as well. Essentially the Rams offered us a 2nd and a 3rd. And depending on where that team is....in the future....those picks could be a late 2nd and late 3rd. Would have been moronic to take those "1st's". The coach after our next coach would have loved to have them I guess.

 

As an asset used in making trades. A 1st down the line depreciates.

 

As an actual draft pick. A 1st down the line is still a 1st rounder. 

 

In case that was a clerical error, or brain fart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ThPantherFan Grand Master

ThPantherFan

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Thanks to the franchise tag, we will always have the leverage. Declining the trade does not provide any leverage to burns. I’m actually interested in how you think us not trading creates “leverage” for burns 

I've said in another post that Burns needs to stay here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted

As I have said before why not let the new coach and hopefully GM decide? He’s on track for a record year for him so his value is not going anywhere…will be more attractive for top HC candidates for as well I’m sure.

Don’t have to tag him until 2024…just wait, plenty of time. I know he wants a new contract but that won’t be effected either way time wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Luciu5 Veteran

Luciu5

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Gerry Green said:

 

As an asset used in making trades. A 1st down the line depreciates.

 

As an actual draft pick. A 1st down the line is still a 1st rounder. 

 

In case that was a clerical error, or brain fart. 

I was speaking straight from a trade negotiation standpoint. The front office was looking at a 2nd a 3rd equivalent. All front offices use trade charts and that's how they would have weighed this offer.

Edited by Luciu5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

I was speaking straight from a trade negotiation standpoint. The front office was looking at a 2nd a 3rd equivalent. All front offices use trade charts and that's how they would have weighed this offer.

 

Gotcha. I was just spinning it so it slanted to my favor. Yeah, that's the ticket,

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted

I think many are looking at draft “value” incorrectly. Here’s why….

If we make the trade next year this time for the Rams 1st rounders in ‘24 & ‘25, many would applaud the move because it’s the “current” year’s first. 

Reality is if you make the trade now, you can take advantage of the devalued future picks by asking for more compensation. A 2023 3rd or 4th rounder, for example. You should use those perceptions to work in your favor by acquiring more now.

——————
Assets the same now versus a year from now:

2024 1st and 2025 1st

 

Pros to trading now:

Acquire more draft capital or a player in exchange for the “devalued future picks” 

 

Pros to making the trade a year from now:

Another year of Burns playing DE for the Panthers.

——————

It’s the same picks now vs a year from now. You can’t say it’s a good trade then, but bad now. If you’re going to make the trade, you absolutely do it now to cash in more. We’re a couple years out from making a run, so the additional games from Burns isn’t an asset to me unless you plan to extend him. 
 

It seems obvious we’ve decided he’s going to be the cornerstone of our defense over the next 5-10 years. Hopefully he’s worth it. I think he can be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • chbright
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By chbright · Posted

      Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Jackie Lee
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
    • micnificent28
      Hypothetical question draft content*

      By micnificent28 · Posted

      Well I guess he should stop playing football. This was his defining moment and chance to prove he was generational and he failed. What a waste of football life..
×
×
  • Create New...