Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dolphins extend Chubb


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

Draft picks value decrease as well. Essentially the Rams offered us a 2nd and a 3rd. And depending on where that team is....in the future....those picks could be a late 2nd and late 3rd. Would have been moronic to take those "1st's". The coach after our next coach would have loved to have them I guess.

 

As an asset used in making trades. A 1st down the line depreciates.

 

As an actual draft pick. A 1st down the line is still a 1st rounder. 

 

In case that was a clerical error, or brain fart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Thanks to the franchise tag, we will always have the leverage. Declining the trade does not provide any leverage to burns. I’m actually interested in how you think us not trading creates “leverage” for burns 

I've said in another post that Burns needs to stay here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I have said before why not let the new coach and hopefully GM decide? He’s on track for a record year for him so his value is not going anywhere…will be more attractive for top HC candidates for as well I’m sure.

Don’t have to tag him until 2024…just wait, plenty of time. I know he wants a new contract but that won’t be effected either way time wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gerry Green said:

 

As an asset used in making trades. A 1st down the line depreciates.

 

As an actual draft pick. A 1st down the line is still a 1st rounder. 

 

In case that was a clerical error, or brain fart. 

I was speaking straight from a trade negotiation standpoint. The front office was looking at a 2nd a 3rd equivalent. All front offices use trade charts and that's how they would have weighed this offer.

Edited by Luciu5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

I was speaking straight from a trade negotiation standpoint. The front office was looking at a 2nd a 3rd equivalent. All front offices use trade charts and that's how they would have weighed this offer.

 

Gotcha. I was just spinning it so it slanted to my favor. Yeah, that's the ticket,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think many are looking at draft “value” incorrectly. Here’s why….

If we make the trade next year this time for the Rams 1st rounders in ‘24 & ‘25, many would applaud the move because it’s the “current” year’s first. 

Reality is if you make the trade now, you can take advantage of the devalued future picks by asking for more compensation. A 2023 3rd or 4th rounder, for example. You should use those perceptions to work in your favor by acquiring more now.

——————
Assets the same now versus a year from now:

2024 1st and 2025 1st

 

Pros to trading now:

Acquire more draft capital or a player in exchange for the “devalued future picks” 

 

Pros to making the trade a year from now:

Another year of Burns playing DE for the Panthers.

——————

It’s the same picks now vs a year from now. You can’t say it’s a good trade then, but bad now. If you’re going to make the trade, you absolutely do it now to cash in more. We’re a couple years out from making a run, so the additional games from Burns isn’t an asset to me unless you plan to extend him. 
 

It seems obvious we’ve decided he’s going to be the cornerstone of our defense over the next 5-10 years. Hopefully he’s worth it. I think he can be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was still in the throes of a contentious divorce and my job at the time had me work on Sundays.  At the beginning of the season I tried to still work around Sundays so I could see our games.  I think after Bryce came back from the benching, I said fug it.  First time in my life I intentionally didn’t watch our games, even through the Atlanta finale.  In the past, even if we didn’t live up to expectations, I would watch to still support and at least analyze player development, strengths and weaknesses, coaching, etc., but Bryce makes all of that a moot point, so I stopped watching. Again, this is asinine,  it if he is retained (still can’t believe this is even a possibility of a conversation due to how shitty our organization has become under Tepper), I will NOT watch next season until he is gone.
    • Live look at Bryce playing ping pong.
    • I think a lot of us are feeling this way, enough is enough. There is absolutely no reason to subject the fans of your team to another full season of Bryce fuging Young. I already don't watch like I used to,I miss games and don't even care. Before I was always at the games or in my recliner when the game started now what's the point. Bryce won't have more than 50 yards passing by halftime anyway.   It's crazy how we watch these other teams dump a trash QB quickly yet here we are in year 3 still hoping he will get better,news flash,he won't. I'm not down for year 4,wake me up if we ever decide to replace the mistake.  fug it I can spend more time with my family or making money,fug Tepper.  
×
×
  • Create New...