We even messed up on tanking

[RumHam]

For the haul we could have got for burns and moore, it should have been done. But again, tepper or fit or both believed because we beat a terrible bucs team we had a shot to do something. Tepper's dumpster fire continues

[Panthercougar68]

If calling Tampa terrible makes You feel better. We still have pick #2 at the moment.

[Growl]

The goal of tanking is to get a QB, as long as they finish with a top 2 pick they’ve achieved that goal

the teams who do finish with a top 2 pick probably aren’t moving off that regardless of whatever draft capital you offer them

besides if you’re really desperate to outbid those guys will still have immense trade value come draft season

[Mr. Scot]

Pretty difficult to mess up on something you were never doing.

[Rags]

Burns is still our best pass rusher and one of the leaders on Defense.

We need help at both LB and Edge. Not only is there no competent threat across from him there's literally no depth to spell him or wear out the o-line.

It's so weird how you guys think causing MORE roster problems will suddenly fix the roster problems we had but you know, again, post lost reactionary huddle takes are the funniest.

[top dawg]

Trading Moore for a one was a nonstarter. He's arguably worth more than that now, especially with his relatively decent contract. The dead money wasn't worth just a first alone. If they had added a second, then yeah, but a first was basically nothing.

Not trading Burns was ill-advised in my opinion (bordering on crazy). But, Burns is still young, and will still have high value once mid-March rolls around. Hell, he added a sack today. 

Like I said in another thread, if we add a more complete DE and a more complete WR, we'll maximize Burns' and Moore's effectiveness and productivity.

[Eric4280]

I love that we have 16 threads on not trading Burns. Such a unique thought each time.

[DeSim]

There’s more to life than football lol…take a break from the internet and football and try to enjoy things in life that you can actually control. 

That goes to all people who post reaction threads acting as if their life is now over. 

[YourLastThought]

These QB's some people want us to tank for sure don't look like Cam Newton or Andrew Luck types to me. And who the hell wants to sit there and have no fun while cheering on their team to lose so they can come here bitching about how bad their team is right after yet the entire time wanting them to lose anyhow. Seems like a toxic shitty way to do a fan experience but what the hell do I know anyhow I guess.......

[DaveThePanther2008]

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

Trading Moore for a one was a nonstarter. He's arguably worth more than that now, especially with his relatively decent contract. The dead money wasn't worth just a first alone. If they had added a second, then yeah, but a first was basically nothing.

Not trading Burns was ill-advised in my opinion (bordering on crazy). But, Burns is still young, and will still have high value once mid-March rolls around. Hell, he added a sack today. 

Like I said in another thread, if we add a more complete DE and a more complete WR, we'll maximize Burns' and Moore's effectiveness and productivity.

But, But, but we can have all those 1sts round draft picks and rebuild with unknowns.  Come On, Man

[PootieNunu]

8 hours ago, top dawg said:

Trading Moore for a one was a nonstarter. He's arguably worth more than that now, especially with his relatively decent contract. The dead money wasn't worth just a first alone. If they had added a second, then yeah, but a first was basically nothing.

Not trading Burns was ill-advised in my opinion (bordering on crazy). But, Burns is still young, and will still have high value once mid-March rolls around. Hell, he added a sack today. 

Like I said in another thread, if we add a more complete DE and a more complete WR, we'll maximize Burns' and Moore's effectiveness and productivity.

So to make Burns and Moore useful we need a real DE and a real #1 WR, gotcha.

So we are paying them like superstars to be complimentary pieces, sounds about right for the Panthers.

[CardiacCat]

8 hours ago, Rags said:

Burns is still our best pass rusher and one of the leaders on Defense.

We need help at both LB and Edge. Not only is there no competent threat across from him there's literally no depth to spell him or wear out the o-line.

It's so weird how you guys think causing MORE roster problems will suddenly fix the roster problems we had but you know, again, post lost reactionary huddle takes are the funniest.

One of the few good posts here, most others appear alcohol-induced nonsensical blurbs....

[PootieNunu]

8 hours ago, Rags said:

Burns is still our best pass rusher and one of the leaders on Defense.

We need help at both LB and Edge. Not only is there no competent threat across from him there's literally no depth to spell him or wear out the o-line.

It's so weird how you guys think causing MORE roster problems will suddenly fix the roster problems we had but you know, again, post lost reactionary huddle takes are the funniest.

Explain what keeping burns has done for us?

We now have the right to give him a mega contract that he is not going to be worth. On a winning team Burns is only in on clear passing downs, he cannot stop the run, why is that so hard to see? 

He is only a pass rusher and he isnt even a top 5 guy at doing that. 

[PootieNunu]

8 minutes ago, CardiacCat said:

One of the few good posts here, most others appear alcohol-induced nonsensical blurbs....

You same guys will be wishing we had those first round picks in 2024/25 when we are paying burns 20m a year and he is still only getting 8-9 sacks and getting abused in the run game.

Edited November 7, 2022 by PootieNunu