Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Orlovsky believes Maye and Williams are better than anyone this class


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Kiss of death

Not for Justin Herbert or Matt Corral, yet and Kyle Trask is still an NFL QB. 

Yeah draft position matters. It's not always fair but it matters.

Me and Payton Manning think Levis is the best QB in THIS class. I agree.

I do think that Levis should be a late first rounder that's the sweet spot for the risk.

Stroud looks good but again he has all teh best of the best recruits around him and more lined up behind them. I worry about lack of adversity.

Levis and Corral had to overcome not having the best this and that.

Emoji Love GIF by ZIPENG ZHU

Edited by rippadonn
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

But they'll be an even better class of QBs in '25!!!!!!!!!!!

Meh....quit playing this stupid game and just try to get the best QB you can WHEN you can. 

They really thought we would think they hit two home runs last draft, LT and a unexpected QB they already scouted and wanted.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They said we had the worst QB option in years the year that we ended up with Cam. You take a shot until you find your guy. If you wait because it’s the “safe route” you push your team further and further behind. We are taking a QB this year in the 1st, I bet my left nut on it. Is it a risk? Of course…but wait until you get the bill for not taking a risk. Horn could be a beast but who in this board looks at Fields and his development over the last few weeks and believe we are a better team for taking a safe bet at CB over a possible franchise guy. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

 Horn could be a beast but who in this board looks at Fields and his development over the last few weeks and believe we are a better team for taking a safe bet at CB over a possible franchise guy. 

Oh we've got a little gang of anti-Fields guys still in denial/or pulling the "who cares he's not our QB" card. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...