Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Foreman Vs Mike Davis?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

Foreman looks like the missing hammer this team has been missing all those missed CMC 4th and 1 conversions. But seems we have in short term always found some relatively obscure rb to emerge whenever CMC vacates carries. Mike Davis comes to mind... with that said which is better? and do we resign or let him walk like Davis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not worth much money and I don't like backs that aren't a threat to score everytime they touch the ball.

Give him a  reasonable offer that's it.

He's  Benefiting from the best run blocking we've had in years.

Bozeman is probably the best center we've had in 4 to 5 years in the run game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we please NOT re-sign a RB midseason just because he had a couple good games against some bad rushing defenses? Look, I like Foreman a lot, I watched him at Texas and he was a total monster in 2016, wanted the Panthers to draft him in 2017 as a replacement for Stewart, but he's had a lot of issues in the NFL. He made some dumbass mistakes, got in trouble, and he's had injury issues. Decisions like that are why the Panthers always struggle. 

Let him play out the rest of the year, see how he does, and maybe he gets another 1 or at most 2 year deal.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Can we please NOT re-sign a RB midseason just because he had a couple good games against some bad rushing defenses? Look, I like Foreman a lot, I watched him at Texas and he was a total monster in 2016, wanted the Panthers to draft him in 2017 as a replacement for Stewart, but he's had a lot of issues in the NFL. He made some dumbass mistakes, got in trouble, and he's had injury issues. Decisions like that are why the Panthers always struggle. 

Let him play out the rest of the year, see how he does, and maybe he gets another 1 or at most 2 year deal.

What's that?  Sorry we can't hear you through that bag over your head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...