Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Foreman Vs Mike Davis?

micnificent28

By micnificent28,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

micnificent28 Veteran

micnificent28

Posted
Posted

Foreman looks like the missing hammer this team has been missing all those missed CMC 4th and 1 conversions. But seems we have in short term always found some relatively obscure rb to emerge whenever CMC vacates carries. Mike Davis comes to mind... with that said which is better? and do we resign or let him walk like Davis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted

He's not worth much money and I don't like backs that aren't a threat to score everytime they touch the ball.

Give him a  reasonable offer that's it.

He's  Benefiting from the best run blocking we've had in years.

Bozeman is probably the best center we've had in 4 to 5 years in the run game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted

Can we please NOT re-sign a RB midseason just because he had a couple good games against some bad rushing defenses? Look, I like Foreman a lot, I watched him at Texas and he was a total monster in 2016, wanted the Panthers to draft him in 2017 as a replacement for Stewart, but he's had a lot of issues in the NFL. He made some dumbass mistakes, got in trouble, and he's had injury issues. Decisions like that are why the Panthers always struggle. 

Let him play out the rest of the year, see how he does, and maybe he gets another 1 or at most 2 year deal.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MasterAwesome Veteran

MasterAwesome

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Can we please NOT re-sign a RB midseason just because he had a couple good games against some bad rushing defenses? Look, I like Foreman a lot, I watched him at Texas and he was a total monster in 2016, wanted the Panthers to draft him in 2017 as a replacement for Stewart, but he's had a lot of issues in the NFL. He made some dumbass mistakes, got in trouble, and he's had injury issues. Decisions like that are why the Panthers always struggle. 

Let him play out the rest of the year, see how he does, and maybe he gets another 1 or at most 2 year deal.

What's that?  Sorry we can't hear you through that bag over your head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Hes Short as Hell but Man I Like This Kid

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      What I'm saying is that he wouldn't be on my board to be drafted. He'd be on the "if these guys go undrafted, give them a call" board.
    • TD alt
      Hes Short as Hell but Man I Like This Kid

      By TD alt · Posted

      Like I said before, I don't get the "only as a UDFA" sentiment, you have to keep following your board. Now if Pavia falls to what amounts to the supplementary UDFA section of the board, that's great, but if he's sitting at the top when you're picking day three (yes, I can't see him being drafted before day three), then you pull the trigger. Rounds 5-7 don't generally provide keepers anyway, you can use them for players that you want to take a closer look at that you may be able to develop.  Pavia may not translate to the pros. Nobody would bet anything of value on it. But, he was highly productive in college due to his play extension abilities, "body torque" mechanics on short and intermediate throws, and good accuracy on said throws. And, he has that dawg in him to be sure.  All that being said, Drew Allar will probably be able to be had on day three, and if it comes down to it--due to nothing but my prejudice against short, weak-armed QBs--I'd pick Allar.
    • TD alt
      This Video was Eye Opening To me

      By TD alt · Posted

      Yeah, receivers contracts are crazy, and it's probably not going to change. You almost have to take your swings--keep some picks at WR churning between rounds one through three in order to keep your costs down and give you options at contract time. Creating that value surplus appears to be more important at WR and all the premium positions than getting a non-premium position player who generally are just easier to replace as it pertains to value. The holy grail is to hit on a premium position late, but due to the gradually declining hit rate on days one and two that drops off a cliff day three, you basically have to get lucky. 
×
×
  • Create New...