Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical Path to Superb Owl


1989
 Share

Recommended Posts

Green Bay keeps losing. They draft a QB early…Stroud or Young. They release Rodgers. 

We sign Rodgers (he stops doing mushrooms), draft a top DE, sign a top free agent LB…BOOM…Super Bowl.

I even think we keep Wilks. (I like him a lot and the players seem to love him.)

#Madden.

Pie away.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve been thinking about this for two weeks straight it makes so much sense if stick up on talent I could see him doing two years here like Tom in Tampa. Wee need a strong defense and to add a few playmakers we have the line. If we retain DF our running game should be solid, a couple of upgrades and we’re real destination spot that you could drop in a qb to get us there. Arod seems done or tired of GB it’s not as far fetched as some may think.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 1989 said:

Green Bay keeps losing. They draft a QB early…Stroud or Young. They release Rodgers. 

We sign Rodgers (he stops doing mushrooms), draft a top DE, sign a top free agent LB…BOOM…Super Bowl.

I even think we keep Wilks. (I like him a lot and the players seem to love him.)

#Madden.

Pie away.

Better idea than Tanking for a QB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1989 said:

Green Bay keeps losing. They draft a QB early…Stroud or Young. They release Rodgers. 

We sign Rodgers (he stops doing mushrooms), draft a top DE, sign a top free agent LB…BOOM…Super Bowl.

I even think we keep Wilks. (I like him a lot and the players seem to love him.)

#Madden.

Pie away.

Stop posting dumb poo.  Draft a qb and keep drafting if you wiff. Stop with retread QBs. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...