Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF grades (Week 11)


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

1. DE Amaré Barno: 74.9
2. S Sam Franklin Jr.: 70.1
3. LB Frankie Luvu: 69.6
4. S Xavier Woods: 68.2
5. CB Jaycee Horn: 65.8

Sam Franklin... low key becoming a beast on ST. If you would have asked me b4 this game though I would've never suggested he see playing time. But yesterday he made a couple of plays that caught my attention. 

Luvu and Woods are two players I'm glad we locked up for more than a year. I love the constant communication I see on defense. 

Barno though.... he's a project but I'd keep him around. Get that man a personal chef and lock him in the weight room. For where he was picked...if yesterday is as any early indication...I'm liking the returns. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Martin said:

What didn’t you like about his game this week? 

He was routinely taken care of by a single blocker the entire game.  Most of the times he makes a play is when someone else gets penetration and forces the play back to him, or they forget to block him entirely.  One of his hurries was completely unblocked.  Same with the sack

Edited by PNW_PantherMan
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

Why earth does the coaching staff want CJ Henderson in the parking lot before the snap?? If trust level is that bad, play a different CB...

 

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Play zone 10 yards off a guy they can usually keep separation 

Because Wilks' approach is the same as Ron's. Play 10 deep on that soft coverage. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Yep and apparently if you don't think so, you're too dumb to even converse with.😩

Burns sack was a blown assignment and he went completely untouched to the QB.  The RT, for whatever reason, took another player.  I could have made that sack.  Just say'n... it is what it is.  Hey, Burns padded his sack stats and ain't mad about it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He was routinely taken care of by a single blocker the entire game.  Most of the times he makes a play is when someone else gets penetration and forces the play back to him, or they forget to block him entirely.  One of his hurries was completely unblocked.  Same with the sack

Yes. One man negates him in the run game. He needs to get bigger and stronger. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He was routinely taken care of by a single blocker the entire game.  Most of the times he makes a play is when someone else gets penetration and forces the play back to him, or they forget to block him entirely.  One of his hurries was completely unblocked.  Same with the sack

I didn’t catch the whole game, but from what I saw the defense outside of Henderson was very, very good. Looked like Burns held up very well against the run and I didn’t see any mistakes on his past. If I remember correctly he bullrushed the LT a few times. He’s no Lawrence Taylor for sure, and he never will be, but I thought he had a good game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...