Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If We Win Out...


Asaria
 Share

Recommended Posts

If we win out, finish 9-8 AND also somehow win the Wild Card Playoff game(Which would entirely depend on who said team is) would you guys be open to keeping Wilks and Darnold?

I would be, if atleast for 1 more year to see Wilks put together a actual coaching staff around him(He has what, 3 defensive coaches left?) and how Darnold would do with a actual offensive line. Unlike some people, I want this to happen, I'm cheering that we win every week(No guarantee I'll even be alive come next season so I'd rather not tank the year away) and I would fully support Wilks and Darnold coming back if we made it to the Divisional Round.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
  • Poo 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Not gonna happen. 

2. Hell no to Darnold. Hell no to PJ. Hell no to Baker. 

3. Maybe to Wilkes. I'm still not entirely convinced. I want to see what our options are at the end of the year. I'd prefer an offensive minded coach. 

Edited by Kuhndog94
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Asaria said:

If we win out, finish 9-8 AND also somehow win the Wild Card Playoff game(Which would entirely depend on who said team is) would you guys be open to keeping Wilks and Darnold?

I would be, if atleast for 1 more year to see Wilks put together a actual coaching staff around him(He has what, 3 defensive coaches left?) and how Darnold would do with a actual offensive line. Unlike some people, I want this to happen, I'm cheering that we win every week(No guarantee I'll even be alive come next season so I'd rather not tank the year away) and I would fully support Wilks and Darnold coming back if we made it to the Divisional Round.

This got deep hellllllla quick.... 

 

but yea, im down to draft best D player available and ride Wilks/Corral

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm up for imagining whatever reality has us not reaching for this year's Zach Wilson because we simply have to draft a QB in the first round.

Right now that's rooting for playoffs and grabbing whichever QB falls. Because I don't think we're getting top 2, and frankly I'm not even enamored with the second QB on the big board. God knows I don't want to reach on Levis at the #3 spot.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we win out.......trees will tap dance.

While I think all of our remaining games are individually winnable, I also think the task of winning all of them is beyond us.  At this point, we have not even won consecutive games this year.

We need to win two in a row first, then three, so we get to four in a row.  Once we get there, the idea of waking up with a 13-inch penis has me intrigued.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...