Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Weapons


DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

So first we needed a good OL before considering drafting a QB. Now we need an arsenal of weapons for him first? Why are people so worried about us drafting one? It has to be done. We have to find a QB then build around him. If we start building too good of a roster first we could be stuck in Colts land. A good OC can scheme some of our guys open. We do need to draft a TE early, but we are far from the worst place for a rookie QB to play providing we land a good coach. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Sam the Cat said:

That's what I said last week and half the board si set on gambling on another QB with our 1st round draft pick.  I think we need upgrades onTE, WR, OL...before drafting a QB in current position.

We definitely do. TE first because that group is the farthest away from being NFL starter material. I actually think TMJ can be really good but he needs a little bit more time. We need a proven #2 guy to put out there consistently and yes our OL is pretty terrible at pass blocking but it could be the scheme. It’s hard to say with mcadoo running the show. So I’d put OC ahead of first round QB at this point too. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

Marshall was wide open for a tuddy Sam under threw it. But we do need to upgrade RB TE and Shi. But biggest issue is no one is being schemed open. I’m starting to really want Stroud he has them sideline throws on a string 

I'm not sure he did under throw it - the S was coming across. Either way with how bad QB play has been for years in Charlotte I was just happy with the long completion.

I wish Marshall had made that contested catch later in the game too - it turned 7 points into 3.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Wolfcop said:

Agreed. Other than the OL, time to overhaul the entire offense. 

^^^^^This.  We got rid of our only real weapon in CMC.  Moore would be a #2 on teams with deep receiving corps. But "DRAFT A QB" they all say.  And do what?  Have the poor guy throw to Shi Smith, TMJ, Ian Thomas and Chuba out of the backfield?  LOl, dude would be set up for failure right out of the gate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with OP.  Cam's rookie season in comparison to what we have now:  Williams and Stewart for RB, #89, Greg, and Shockey along with a solid O-line (Gross, Wharton, Kalil).  #89 had over 1,300 yards in Cam's rookie year.  Any rookie QB thrown into this current offense would not be successful.  Whoever they are targeting to be QB next year, they better start by getting him some weapons.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

^^^^^This.  We got rid of our only real weapon in CMC.  Moore would be a #2 on teams with deep receiving corps. But "DRAFT A QB" they all say.  And do what?  Have the poor guy throw to Shi Smith, TMJ, Ian Thomas and Chuba out of the backfield?  LOl, dude would be set up for failure right out of the gate.

I definitely see what you are saying but our rookie is more than likely going to struggling his rookie year anyway. Especially if we draft AR or Levis. The offense will need to be simplified if they are even going to play year one at all. Lawrence, Jones, Fields, and Burrow didn’t have many weapons their rookie year. Hell some of those guys (not named Burrow) still have few weapons. We are going to also have more draft picks (especially after that CMC trade) to acquire some weapons.Normally bad teams are getting these top picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, thennek said:

Agree with OP.  Cam's rookie season in comparison to what we have now:  Williams and Stewart for RB, #89, Greg, and Shockey along with a solid O-line (Gross, Wharton, Kalil).  #89 had over 1,300 yards in Cam's rookie year.  Any rookie QB thrown into this current offense would not be successful.  Whoever they are targeting to be QB next year, they better start by getting him some weapons.  

How can we fairly judge these weapons when we have with McAdoo designing and calling the plays? TMJ was a stud on that loaded LSU team, Moore passed 1000 yards every year with poo for QBs and OCs. A new staff can do wonders for some of these young guys. Hell we don’t even use Higgins who was and decent option in the Browns offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Despite the fact that some folks here want you to believe Scott Fitterer was a glorified errand boy he signed off on that Ian Thomas contract extension.

Yep. I've long said Fitt was either part of the problem by making some of the decisions or part of the problem by being just a yes man. He needs to go too.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Quentin Johnson, Jordan Addison, & Michael Mayer would be injections we need if we aren't in a spot to draft Young or Stroud.  I however think we would place the upside value in Levis or Richardson above that.

100% correct. A top weapon that's polished should take priority over project QBs.  I'm not sure the team will see it that way if a QB is dangling in front of them on the draft board though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only WR that makes sense in the first is KC Concepcion. He fills multiple roles in the offense and is a PR specialist.
    • That depends upon what happens with receiver this year and what happens with free agency next year. Hopefully we'll be good by addressing receiver this year (regardless of whether we snag one in the first round or not). If we don't and are unlucky enough for to Coker get hurt (and X solidifies his bust status, and JAGs be JAGing), then we may be fùçked! But I assume that Dan Morgan and company will feel compelled to look for answers in free agency and use that to set up the draft just like this offseason.  Reality is not as simple as we drafted this position X times in a row in the first. If you're suggesting that we could draft a position in the first four times in a row, that's not likely. At some point probability has to be taken into account. I mean, how many years in a row can you be unlucky with one position?  As I've said at times before, you try and plan for the long term personnel-wise and cap-wise of course, but things happen so, in a sense, you still must look at each season--each "team" if you will--unto itself each season. So many things can happen between now and then. A major industry can profoundly impact the bigger picture (like this year), someone could offer you a trade proposal that you can't resist, players might not have progressed to your expectations--you know, things like that. Moreover, you have to be aware of the dynamics of each draft class, including the fact that there could be unexpected draft risers and fallers during the college season. That's a lot. As of today, we expect the 2027 draft to have more exclamations than question marks at OT and the QB class and WR group is expected to be exceptionally strong. We'll have a clearer picture of whatever we'll have to focus on next year at this time.  Lastly, keep in mind that there's always more than one way to get you to where you want to go. The yearly puzzle is not static, it's dynamic and complex.   
    • I'm fine with Thieneman or McNeil-Warren.. Rodriguez won't last until 51 so they would have to trade up, he may end up being a late first round selection. Anthony Hill Jr. is more likely to be available. I don't expect defense in the first round now after the murmurings of finding another weapon for Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...