Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lmao.... Panthers still control their own destiny....


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, stbugs said:

The entire staff is not good enough. As much as some people, like our faithful leader, want to blame only Rhule, there’s very little evidence that anyone else left wasn’t a big part of all these terrible decisions on and off the field.

Wilks looks ok because we are 4-5 with him but we are 0-2 (one humiliating) against above .500 teams and our wins are against 7-7, 6-8, 5-9 and 4-10 teams  with Seattle as the only road win. We’ve also lost the other 3 games to 5-9, 5-9 and 4-9 teams.

There is enough things to warrant Wilks not getting the job but you cannot use the schedule against him. He didn't decide what team we play or what their record will be as does any other coach. 

He has currently gone 4-3 against .500 teams or below. He is 0-2 against better competition. He started with a 1-5 record gifted to him in a shitty division. All the while using a team he did not build. 

He's old school and he's not completely wrong in his approach given the circumstances.  To win consistently in this league you have to at least be able to run the ball and have a good defense.

But you also have to have a balanced offense to be able to keep the opponent guessing.  You want to stop the run? Go ahead. We will pick you apart through the air. Want to shut down the pass? Have at it. We will run it down your throat. Until we have the personal to do that we are stuck with what you are seeing now.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, stbugs said:

The entire staff is not good enough. As much as some people, like our faithful leader, want to blame only Rhule, there’s very little evidence that anyone else left wasn’t a big part of all these terrible decisions on and off the field.

Wilks looks ok because we are 4-5 with him but we are 0-2 (one humiliating) against above .500 teams and our wins are against 7-7, 6-8, 5-9 and 4-10 teams  with Seattle as the only road win. We’ve also lost the other 3 games to 5-9, 5-9 and 4-9 teams.

To be fair, Wilks can only work with what he has. That being said, he's lost games that he shouldn't have, and I have a hard time believing he'll be able to hang with the best coaches of the league because he's just too conservative and dogmatic in his offensive approach. Talent will likely only take you so far; you must be able to make adjustments---offensively and defensively---when your game plan isn't working, and I personally think that you must think outside the box when warranted, or at least play to the situation at hand.

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bigdog10 said:

There’s a scenario where we clinch the division against the Bucs on New Years day and have nothing to play for in New Orleans. 
 

Here is that scenario

Falcons lose at Ravens

Saints lose at Browns

Panthers beat Lions

Bucs lose at Cardinals

 

if those four things happen this week a panthers win vs the Bucs gives the panthers the division and an essential bye week in week 18 against the Saints. 

undefined

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

There is enough things to warrant Wilks not getting the job but you cannot use the schedule against him. He didn't decide what team we play or what their record will be as does any other coach. 

He has currently gone 4-3 against .500 teams or below. He is 0-2 against better competition. He started with a 1-5 record gifted to him in a shitty division. All the while using a team he did not build. 

He's old school and he's not completely wrong in his approach given the circumstances.  To win consistently in this league you have to at least be able to run the ball and have a good defense.

But you also have to have a balanced offense to be able to keep the opponent guessing.  You want to stop the run? Go ahead. We will pick you apart through the air. Want to shut down the pass? Have at it. We will run it down your throat. Until we have the personal to do that we are stuck with what you are seeing now.

 

I do believe that there is a vast majority of Huddlers who seem to have forgotten just how young this team is. It takes a while to find out who you are. But patience is not a Huddle virtue. 

 

Just think what it will be like next year if we get a rookie QB, and a new coach? The losing will be epic.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Yes...like, wtf is the problem with wanting to see january football? Like fug, y'all act like winning is a bad thing. FFS.

 

We are a very young team just trying to learn to win. Every win builds just a little bit more confidence. It takes time to put it all together. Unfortunately, time is not in the Huddle dictionary.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

We are a very young team just trying to learn to win. Every win builds just a little bit more confidence. It takes time to put it all together. Unfortunately, time is not in the Huddle dictionary.

Is this a serious post? How many 5-11 or 5-12 seasons do you guys need to sit through before you figure out winning meaningless games in December doesn’t mean sh!t? 
 

Is that you, Matt Rhule? 

  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not a pro-tanker, but after watching yesterday, I just want the season to end. 

Even if we get in, we will get smoked at home by a competent Team. Struggling against Trubisky at home with what was on the line is all I need to see. 

The Ravens and Bengals are a better litmus test for us and we did not fare well. Defenses are now stacking the box, and are daring Darnold to beat us. 

Being in the top-5 and getting a shot at Young, Stroud, Carter, Anderson or Murphy is huge. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...