Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jason LaCanfora: Panthers potential landing spot for Raiders QB Derek Carr


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Every outcast qb is a potential landing spot with the Panthers. Tell me something we don't already know. 

Soooooo give another chance to Baker?!?!?!?!

 

props to you for calling that one before it happened. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

If he got cut or let go id take him no problem. I don’t want to trade for him and that contract. 

I think the line of thinking for the benching is they dont want him to get hurt, thus the 40.4mill is on the books for next.

I heard somewhere hes left the team.

About 99.999% chance hes cut now.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Soooooo give another chance at Baker?!?!?!?!

 

props to you for calling that one before it happened. 

I just have no desire to see another vet bridge qb come in here to wetnurse a rookie until he's ready. Especially if it costs more draft picks and top 10 qb money. If you are going to go that route just draft a qb and try to convince Sam to stick around another season while they get the rookie ready for 2024.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...