Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bye Bye Wilks


Recommended Posts

Just now, Proudiddy said:

Again, I don't say it to excuse him, because in my opinion, fug the defense today.  The poo was still on Wilks for punting twice from midfield and that's what got this whole poo avalanche rolling downhill.  fuging dumbass, conservative, pussified bullshit. 

I just want to make it clear Holcomb is complete ass, and yes, Wilks has admitted he's his Phil Snow, so get them both the fug out of here.

Yup it doesnt matter who deserves blame for the D. Both of them need to go

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup. Goodbye.  Don't care about the feel good local story.  Not going for it twice when should.  No timeout on delay.  Evans burning you all game and you make zero changes.   Defensive coach who fails at defense.   Do we want more Fox and Rivera another round ?  No thanks. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Captroop said:

We lost because Brady put up 400+ yard through the air. We're playing a coffee shop barista at CB. This really can't entirely be hung on Wilks

Holcomb is a bad dc and will be tied to his hip.  Wilks is too conservative and not great at scheming.  Hes a great motivator but that's about it.  He has done a commendable job but not going to push us to the top.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

I was never on the Wilks Wagon. I suffered nearly 2 decades of the same poo prior to Rhule.

The only posters that were ever on the wagon were complete prisoners of the moment. This was not his first head scratching loss. We’ve had a few of them. Absolutely no reason to not do our best research on offensive guys and get the one we think is best. Poor @RLC003 might have to change his diaper once Wilks is gone and he can’t poo posts attacking his boy. What a loser. 

Edited by Kentucky Panther
  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...