Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you want to get the #1 pick from the Bears, what's your move?

EgoDogg

By EgoDogg,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Aussie Tank Grand Master

Aussie Tank

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy had his best play here. Darnold had his best play here. Mayfield was the only one who didn't. DJ has put up good stats despite trash at QB. It baffles me how much of this fanbase doesn't comprehend this.

 

Teddy played better in NO and Sams bar wasn’t very high. Moore is not a game changing WR so he is definitely expendable for a franchise QB 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Teddy played better in NO and Sams bar wasn’t very high. Moore is not a game changing WR so he is definitely expendable for a franchise QB 

Teddy played six games in N.O. He had his best sustained play here.

Go ahead and trade DJ but I'll tell you how it ends. It ends in howling and crying about how our new franchise QB has nothing but trash to throw to and we're stunting his development. And the howling and crying would be correct, but a lot of the same folks doing the crying and howling would be the same folks who thought DJ was a JAG and easily replaced. He's not. Fans of this fanbase should more than realize that good receivers don't just grow on trees. We've had very few of them.

 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy played six games in N.O. He had his best sustained play here.

Go ahead and trade DJ but I'll tell you how it ends. It ends in howling and crying about how our new franchise QB has nothing but trash to throw to and we're stunting his development. And the howling and crying would be correct, but a lot of the same folks doing the crying and howling would be the same folks who thought DJ was a JAG and easily replaced. He's not. Fans of this fanbase should more than realize that good receivers don't just grow on trees. We've had very few of them.

 

I don't think this about people wanting to trade D.J. Moore, but about what Chicago will want.

I personally would much rather go back to the Cam days of having terrible receivers, but a great (potentially) quarterback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aussie Tank Grand Master

Aussie Tank

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy played six games in N.O. He had his best sustained play here.

Go ahead and trade DJ but I'll tell you how it ends. It ends in howling and crying about how our new franchise QB has nothing but trash to throw to and we're stunting his development. And the howling and crying would be correct, but a lot of the same folks doing the crying and howling would be the same folks who thought DJ was a JAG and easily replaced. He's not. Fans of this fanbase should more than realize that good receivers don't just grow on trees. We've had very few of them.

 

WR are coming out in droves putting up 1000 yard seasons as rookies if I can add Moore to get our QB I’m doing it all day

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rebelrouser Mentor

rebelrouser

Posted
Posted

Trading into spot for Young or Stroud would be too expensive, Levis could fall to 9 anyway (seeing this more and more in mocks), and no way in hell you give anything away to go after AR.  I would take Levis at 9 (25% chance) or AR with our first second round pick (10% or less chance).    

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted (edited)

This place is bananas. We had the PERFECT chance to have the resources to trade up with little harm to our future ... but we didn't do it. Instead, we traded away our best player for peanuts. We also had the perfect chance to just let things fall as the may and we could have drafted at the top of the pile and had to give up nothing. But now? Now some of you actually want to trade away future for a top pick?

Idiot Facepalm GIF

Edited by Brooklyn 3.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...