Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So which QB do we think will be available at #9?

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Newtcase Proficient

Newtcase

Posted
Posted

I think Trey Lance could be on the market if Purdy keeps playing the way he has, and even more so if they make a deep run in the playoffs.  Furthermore, I don't think Lance would command a huge price.  He's played 3 football games in 3 years and had two significant injuries.

Draft Quentin Johnston at #9, have a QB room with Darnold and two young prospects in Corral and Lance.  Slim scenario but I'd take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Veteran

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mage said:

I think Panthers go after CJ Stroud.

Quite possibly. There's a chance that Houston trades up with Chicago to ensure their division rival is denied their pick at quarterback. From there the Panthers would have to trade up for the second overall pick. Costly, but definitely possible depending on Chicago's needs after free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pww42 Contributor

pww42

Posted
Posted

The best QB from last year’s draft sure looks like Brock Purdy

He was taken dead last in the draft.. 

Cam certainly did us well from  #1. 

So you never know..

Just find the QB you like and take him when you can. If it’s at 9th do it regardless what the “guru” says

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, pww42 said:

The best QB from last year’s draft sure looks like Brock Purdy

He was taken dead last in the draft.. 

Cam certainly did us well from  #1. 

So you never know..

Just find the QB you like and take him when you can. If it’s at 9th do it regardless what the “guru” says

The best QB from the previous draft was Mac Jones. That completely changed in year two. Let’s not be quick to anoint Purdy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mickeye76 Experienced

mickeye76

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, UNCrules2187 said:

My thinking today is that Young, Stroud, and Levis will all be gone within in the top 7 picks. The Texans and Colts will definitely take QBs and I think the Raiders could as well (although McD may prefer reuniting with Brady or Jimmy G as he may want a vet QB given he could be on the hot seat). Even if it's just Houston and Indy, I think there will be teams that trade up to get their guy - Carolina may be one of them.   

1. Chicago - I think prime candidate to trade back with Indy - Indy jumping Houston to get their preferred QB

2. Houston - Could see them taking any of Young/Stroud/Levis (NFL folks seem to really like Levis)

3. Arizona - potential trade back candidate

4. Indy - see Chicago

5. Seattle - think they'll hope that one of Carter or Anderson is still there

6. Detroit - think they'll stick with Goff, could see them being a prime trade back candidate if one of Young/Stroud/Levis sis till on the board

7. Oakland - see above

8. Atlanta - could go QB, could go BPA

1. Chicago - plays the phone but for arguments sake takes Anderson. 

2. Houston - Young 

3. Arizona- also trade down option like Chicago but in this scenario Carter

4. Indy - CJ 

5. Seattle - surprise pick first WR off Addison. 

6. Detroit - Levis 

7. Oakland - AR 

8. Atlanta - Murohy top DE 

or Chicago and Arizona both trade down and Young, Stround and Levis go one two three.  AR still doesn't make it to us cause Anderson, Carter, Murphy and whoever the top corner is go then Oakland takes AR. Atlanta goes DE or WR. We sitting there with no QB.  We will have options at DE, WR, DT, CB  and LB.  QB is likely off the table.  

Edited by mickeye76
Misspell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • travisura
      How accurate is Madden for coaches?

      By travisura · Posted

      Same for Clemson lol
    • rayzor
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By rayzor · Posted

      i am anxious to see what he does with this new situation. i think the schedule is about as favorable as you could hope for the first half of the year. i don't expect a dramatic and quick  improvement, but i do expect improvement.
    • rayzor
      Does anyone actually think Bryce will actually be good?

      By rayzor · Posted

      truthfully, when did he have time last year to throw it down field? plays took far too long to develop and the OL gave him no time.  i think we are basing far too much of bryce's assessment on a situation that didn't work out in his favor at all. it was probably the worst situation a rookie QB could have found himself in. the only i can think of who had it worse was David Carr, who had an even worse rookie season than Bryce by a significant margin statistically.  i think most would realize that carr was probably a better QB than his record would show, but he was shell shocked in his first few years because they did nothing to try to help him out. 3 of his 5 years in houston he led the league in sacks. i don't think he would ever have been an elite QB, but had he been in a better situation he probably would have had a better and longer career. point is, i don't think we saw everything that bryce is capable of because he was limited by the situation. but i understand the pessimism most have, because all we really have to go on was what we saw last year. that's why i wait to see what happens with a better situation. i just don't think you can give an accurate assessment of him based on last year. it wouldn't be fair for any rookie, tbh, but for one whos situation was so fugged up i think it's even more unfair. had nothing changed in the situation, you could probably expect more of the same. that's just not the case, though. a whole lot changed for the team and for his situation and i think for the better. it just makes sense that if we improved the situation that he will improve. 
×
×
  • Create New...