Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nicole Tepper to help with HC hire


The Lobo
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Growl said:

what a relief it was to get rid of all that Richardson nepotism amirite boyz 

in fairness it didn’t exactly seem easy to do worse that JR by just about all measurements…

somehow Tepper made it look like a piece of fuging cake

weird to say how much I miss JR and his slightly below average ways

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to know what football people are helping with this decision because it sounds a lot like the way he went about the process last time. Mr self-assured. 

 

https://www.si.com/nfl/2019/12/12/david-tepper-carolina-panthers-cam-newton-head-coach-search-nfl-meetings

Tepper’s not hiring help. Many new owners will reach out and hire search firms (like Korn Ferry) or well-worn advisors (like Ron Wolf or Ernie Accorsi). In some cases it’s to give them cover in the face of inexperience—if things go wrong, it’s much easier to explain it if you have somewhere to point the finger. Tepper, to his credit, has no plans to go that route
 

So as they’ve gotten going, and the Panthers are starting to narrow their list, and doing all kinds of background work (one advantage to moving on from Rivera when they did was being able to start in earnest on that), Tepper himself is running point.

“It’ll be primarily by the organization,” he said. “That doesn’t mean I won’t have a couple people I might listen to. If I talk to a couple of my fellow owners about different things, it doesn’t mean I won’t do that. But if you’re asking about formally hiring a search firm, I don’t think we’ll be formally hiring a search firm. That doesn’t mean I won’t talk to people who may be at search firms, that doesn’t mean I won’t talk to other owners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

She probably knows more about business/contracts and football than 75% of this board.

This doesn’t really make sense. Business, contracts, and football are all not only very broad subjects but very different and a specialist at one isn’t at the other.

To that point, I highly doubt she knows more about hiring a HC than a lot of people, Tepper included. Just because they’re owners doesn’t mean poo.

Overall there is zero evidence the people making the decisions are able to made good ones, in fact, quite the contrary.

However, there ARE specialists in making these kind of decisions. JR hired consultants that led to a hire that led to a Super Bowl. 
 

However when an owner who has already solidified himself with the worst results a company has seen in 30 years says fug those consultants, I’ll still make these decisions and now include my wife…well it’s pretty clear to any average person this is just some dumb poo.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hiring an agency to help out would give you the exact same line-up of coaches. It is not a mystery who the top available coaches are. Three years ago they would have suggested Rhule as well. This is why you hire a good GM and assistant GM. It should be their job to find a HC. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BeenPounding said:

Obviously this was the missing link the last go round. 

/cdn-cgi/mirage/8fde5dca59f25768fa42caeef5a6e6e8800846482a7b4eaab6ee7942318b673f/1280/https://media3.giphy.com/media/t4ujgnGQNetmo/200.gif

Maybe this is kind of like when Robert California's wife wanted a job at the Scranton branch of Dunder Mifflin.  (Season 8 episode 9...yes I'm that much of a nerd)

/cdn-cgi/mirage/8fde5dca59f25768fa42caeef5a6e6e8800846482a7b4eaab6ee7942318b673f/1280/https://media4.giphy.com/media/whtCm18V5Bwhecq4P6/200.gif

Amazing episode. When Michael left the show dipped drastically, but there were still some gems like this one. Robert California carried

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...