Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

[Warren Sapp] Bears are trading Justin Fields to draft Bryce Young

thunderraiden

By thunderraiden,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I would say it's the most apropos stat, but it's certainly not the only one (as you posted). There is plenty of evidence to suggest that Lamar is a good passer, but some Huddlers are just...analytically lazy.

 

It's the standard "running QB's aren't real QB's" crap that some of these dolts have been spewing since the days of prime Mike Vick. Just a bunch of fuging idiots who don't have any clue what they are seeing.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KatsAzz Grand Master

KatsAzz

Posted
Posted

Trading Fields would  come as a shock considering how well he played for the Bears this season.

It’s all just rumors at this point, and quite honestly, I’m a little skeptical about it. However, it is definitely something to watch out for, as this could be a massive addition for whoever trades for Fields.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

You folks need to chill out on these prospects and trading for a couple of months. 

There is a chess match about to start in few weeks and things will not be as they appear. Misinformation will be rampant and the media will be pushing narratives and hype. 

Agents will be manning the phones and making deals while pimping their clients through know-it-all TV personalities.

And fans will be demanding that they know who's the best this or that because some experts says they are...and will fight you about it.

and you will be right there through it all insisting the best approach is the team play it safe and signs a cost efficient veteran to man the position until the next can’t miss generational prospect slides to us at #7 next season, or #9 in the following, or #8 after that, on and one forever and ever

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tr3ach Grand Master

Tr3ach

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, top dawg said:

Lamar is not a bad passer, which makes your post null and void. 

His career passer rating is 96.7. 

 

Hes elite against above average to bad teams.  He plays a really good team or makes it to the playoffs and his passing numbers and numbers in general are very bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr Mojo Risin Mentor

Mr Mojo Risin

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

VERY hard pass

Zero interest in Fields, he’s an even worse passer than Lamar and will want a huge contract after next year.

I’ve said from the start that the Bears should trade him and start a new clock on a QB contract extension with one with better passing upside, but that’s also why I wouldn’t want us to take him on.

He only threw the ball 318 times and had 60% completion and 7.0 YPP. You aren't going for 3500+ yards 20+ TDs throwing the ball 318 times with his supporting cast on offense. He's not as bad of a thrower as a lot of you guys are making him out to be.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • TD alt
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By TD alt · Posted

      I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • kungfoodude
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...