Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Even if we trade up to #1....


tarheelfan23
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, GOAT said:

please provide a detailed explination an analysis as to why you believe AR will be better than those two.

or are you just rolling with "he's dat dude bruh, look at him run. youtube highlights be lit".

His defense of Matt Rhule was "he can just coach".

I think you can see where this is headed 😕

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stingray3030 said:

Mahomes is not a running QB - he is a mobile QB.  That is a pass-first QB who runs at times when he scrambles and occasional designed runs.  They have roll out plays as a standard of their game.  Russell Wilson, younger Rogers, Mahomes, Trevor

A running QB runs as a primary function of his game - RPO, designed runs.  Cam Newton, Lamar, Vick, RGIII

Hurts MAY have success long term as a running QB, but so far he has 2 seasons....longevity and consistency is always the issue.  If he loses the SB he would be 2-2....don't crown him yet.

You said no running QB have post seasons success. Which is false. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Not a Colin Cowherd fan but I caught the end of his show and he said that he has a inside source within the Bears front office and he said they are definitely going to try and trade Justin Fields.

 

Give me Fields all day over Richardson or Levis.

Whoa whoa whoa. Fields is trending downward and has failed to cash in on his upside. Why are you salivating over another potential Sam, Baker, failed QB?

I'd rather bank on Levis or Richardson reaching their potential rather than someone who has had their chance and failed to take advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stingray3030 said:

Running QB's don't win in the post season.....never have....doesn't look like they will any time soon.  And AR doesn't look even close to ready.  HARD PASS

I don't think we should take AR at 1, but the running QBs in the postseason talk is very dated.  We have Hurts (who is probably the 2nd/3rd best runner out of all of the QBs in the NFL) and Mahomes (who can run we needed) in the Super Bowl this year.  Cam took us to the big game which involved several post season wins.  Russ Wilson was running pretty often when they won the Super Bowl.  

The thought on AR is fixing his footwork and making him a QB with a cannon who can also beat you with his legs when needed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You trippin!

 

Fields would go #1 if he was in this draft. People saying he can't pass is false. He passed well in college when he had a Oline and WR's. Something he doesn't have in Chicago.

 

Even on a bad roster Fields has shown signs of potential. He will only get better when Chicago decides to give him some help.

Exactly why people are scared of QBs from stacked frontrunner program squads. They have to adjust their game to not having the best linemen, receivers etc. Fields had to try to make that adjustment in the NFL while guys not on superstar squads like Levis and Corral had to lead their receivers, be super accurate and as careful as possible because the margin of error for THEIR team against the SECs best was razor thin, so more impressive, more ready for a team who's margin of error due to NFL level competition is already razor thin too.

Adversity. Hopefully your QB has already had some and developed his callus.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

i want the highest ceiling because i think we have the coaching staff to reach it. 

He has the highest ceiling because he made some circus throws and runs?

Did you watch Stroud vs the juggernaut of college football?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I don't think we should take AR at 1, but the running QBs in the postseason talk is very dated.  We have Hurts (who is probably the 2nd/3rd best runner out of all of the QBs in the NFL) and Mahomes (who can run we needed) in the Super Bowl this year.  Cam took us to the big game which involved several post season wins.  Russ Wilson was running pretty often when they won the Super Bowl.  

The thought on AR is fixing his footwork and making him a QB with a cannon who can also beat you with his legs when needed.  

Running QBs can't throw.

Multiple people have tried to explain this to you.

 

A QB that can beat you from the pocket but can run when he wants is not a running QB. He is a mobile QB.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...