Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carr’s destination betting odds

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, frankw said:

When the time comes you either take the risk or you play it safe. We've seen the results with bringing in other teams leftovers. Try a different approach.

We're getting leftovers from somewhere. Our most seasoned QB going into 23 is not going to be Matt Corral. It all depends on cost, picks and salary. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Reich will most likely try a different approach.   One of those ways is bringing in a better veteran QB.

Well we can't be afraid of developing a young QB. Matt Rhule was. But we've got decades of wisdom on staff now. Chasing discarded veteran QB's should be the last resort for such a seasoned staff we've built.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Growl said:

Carr would be a top 3 QB in the conference,  the team definitely needs to go get their own guy but if there’s a scenario where they can rent him and still draft a guy it’s worth sticking your toes in the water on

Would rather make the big play to move up for their guy but I could understand sticking your nose in, at least if for no other reason than to drive the asking price up for new orleans

You aren't signing Carr then drafting a first round QB in 2023.

He's 32 in March - he gives you 4 years of high level play to find your franchise QB. It's a no brainer if he's interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

You aren't signing Carr then drafting a first round QB in 2023.

He's 32 in March - he gives you 4 years of high level play to find your franchise QB. It's a no brainer if he's interested.

Agree. If Reich ends up being the guy, Carr would be our Alex Smith. 3 years or so to right the ship and then we make a big reach for a QB down the road. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tarheel119 Collaborator

Tarheel119

Posted
Posted

I’m not exactly sure how I feel about this. I think he’s a guy who could be a high level starter for another 2-3 years. Would you draft a raw Richardson to sit behind him or would you move towards another position of need? Next year’s crop of QB’s are good as well. Hence why I’m not exactly sure where I am with all of this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Tarheel119 said:

I’m not exactly sure how I feel about this. I think he’s a guy who could be a high level starter for another 2-3 years. Would you draft a raw Richardson to sit behind him or would you move towards another position of need? Next year’s crop of QB’s are good as well. Hence why I’m not exactly sure where I am with all of this. 

REALLY good.  I'm down with a 2-year rental.  I'd rather go a cheaper route though, Minshew.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Good point 

image.thumb.png.f856e3fe2bad885a8a352f2e0201b7ee.png

Yeah, I see this point, but Carr would not be the franchise QB--he would be the bridge--I get the feeling that they would still be in the market for a young QB this year or next.

And maybe they think they can get Darnold (if they re-sign him) playing at a decent level---I dunno.

I still think we draft a Young QB this year.

However, signing Carr and keeping your draft picks is a bit appealing---considering who we'd end up with at #9.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Luciu5 Veteran

Luciu5

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, Tarheel119 said:

I’m not exactly sure how I feel about this. I think he’s a guy who could be a high level starter for another 2-3 years. Would you draft a raw Richardson to sit behind him or would you move towards another position of need? Next year’s crop of QB’s are good as well. Hence why I’m not exactly sure where I am with all of this. 

With a Carr and this staff, I could see us drafting next year in the 16-24 range. Or we better be if we are dropping $40 million on a QB.

Anyway, how are we getting from 16+ to #1 overall? Especially when 9x out of 10 the #1 pick needs a QB and ain't budging.

If we are drafting a QB, if we want to trade up and want our pick of the class, this is the only year to do that. Otherwise we are moving up to 8-10 to grab someone that falls. I really, really do not see us picking in the top 10 next year.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...