Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Poll: What do you want Panthers to do for QB?


NAS
 Share

What do you want Panthers to do this offseason?  

217 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you want Panthers to do regarding QB situation this offseason

    • Draft best available QB at current draft position (#9)
    • Trade up with Bears (#1) and draft a QB (whatever it takes)
    • Trade up with Cardinals (#3) and draft a QB (whatever it takes)
    • Sign Derek Carr and draft best available player at #9
    • Trade for Lamar Jackson, fully guaranteed contract (Watson like trade)


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm getting the feeling that this may be how it shakes out in the end.

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, NAS said:

Even if it made sense for the Panthers, I don't think Carr chose to be a free agent to sign a 2 year bridge QB deal.  He will have other suiters for a bigger deal.

Not arguing, just saying that we don't really know what Carr wants.

This is a good coaching staff, a terrible division, and we are in the NFC...very few top end QB's right now.

In his shoes, I'm actually looking for a short deal, I'd want to hit the market again prior to 34.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

It's hard to get a guage on what Fitterer has planned for the position.  I hesitate to think that Carr really changes anything they have/had planned but ya never know.  He he's definitely been better than anyone we've had since Cam. If it happens I think the contract he's given will tell us a lot about how long they think they will need for these rookies I suppose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

My thoughts exactly.  We need to get a rook/young guy, but the team needs to start winning, and fast.

With this offensive staff, and if we can just get a piece or two more on offense, Carr would take us to the playoffs in year 1.  We need that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Eric4280 said:

I think it depends on traction for AROD to LV. If say GB has that pick, I think they’ll be wanting just whatever premium talent they can get. I really think we organically end up with stroud if HOU falls in love with Levis. It’s gonna be a fun off season.

If he does, it will be interesting to see what Adams thinks since he made the decision to not play with Rodgers. I'm not so sure the reunion would be a welcome one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Zaximus said:

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

People are comparing Carr to Darnold and Mayfield? 😳

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Zaximus said:

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

People label any QB on their second team as a “retread” unless they are a hall of fame type guy. 
 

They treat them all the same lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Lamar Jackson shouldn't even be on this list. 

 

Lamar talk is just talk on this sub. Ravens have not put him on the trade block as of yet. I think they cave in and offer him more guaranteed money at the end of the day.

 

Aaron Rodgers is more likely to happen if we trade for a QB.

 

Not sure if Rodgers would mind coming here but he would be the dream scenario if we can't get a QB in the draft.

Don't think Bal values Lamar as much as Lamar values Lamar.

The Ravens have been a consistent winning team for 20 years, they were winning before Jackson, and if he's going to cost too much, they will move on and keep on winning.

The very rare team that is good with and without great QB play.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there an option where we absolutely grab a QB, but if we miss on Stroud at 1.09 we take best player available and get another QB in a later round?

Opinion: No doubt we need to add a young QB to develop (along with Matt C.) in this system with all this coaching everyones hyped on, but does it have to be QB at 1.09 or higher at all costs? If BPA is a QB fine, but lets not box ourselves in lads!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...