Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#1 CJ Trade

razorwolf

By razorwolf,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted
Just now, Navy_football said:

I agree. But that's what any team would offer, right? Unless some team with multiple firsts this year wanted to move up. Not sure about that, but generally speaking teams offer future first and second round picks. The Panthers would have had a ton of them. 

Yea, I’m just saying it probably would have taken #9, our second this year and all the Rams picks. Maybe more. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
heel31ok Experienced

heel31ok

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, razorwolf said:

Just a question to anyone. 
 

I’ve read different places about what the colts would probably have to give up to move to #1 (23: 1st, 2nd, 5th; 24: 1st), but I figure the bears are going to want more draft capital than that! But if the bears would accept a offer of that magnitude I’d think I’d be willing to give up (2) 1st (23’ & 24’), 2nd (62), and 5th (148) to move up to #1! What is your opinion on this scenario?

 

Lol...absolutely not

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Yea, I’m just saying it probably would have taken #9, our second this year and all the Rams picks. Maybe more. 

We would have to use our future 1st round picks not the Rams. We could not trade those in this year's draft unless the rules have changed. But we would have the Rams picks for ourselves or possibly trade them in the draft of the year we received them for. If that makes sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bythenbrs Veteran

bythenbrs

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

A lot of timid fans on this board who are content with mediocrity, it seems. The same thing happened back in 2011 when half the board wanted us to draft Marcel Dareus over Cam Newton because of the risk involved.

They were wrong then. They're wrong now. Go get your franchise QB.

[The 49ers and Jets have entered the chat.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted

So much depends on the movement of 

carr

rodgers 

jimmy g

once that clears, better picture 

the combine, too,  will be interesting if any of the top 4 are there 

I’ve wanted CJ or AR from the start.  It will be what it is   One has the goods and one can become the goods with maturity and coaching 

I’ll just say, if this experienced staff believes that who they pick is worth multiple picks, do it 

just do it 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

We would have to use our future 1st round picks not the Rams. We could not trade those in this year's draft unless the rules have changed. But we would have the Rams picks for ourselves or possibly trade them in the draft of the year we received them for. If that makes sense?

You’re going to have to fill me in on that rule. Never heard any restrictions given to certain picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

We would have to use our future 1st round picks not the Rams. We could not trade those in this year's draft unless the rules have changed. But we would have the Rams picks for ourselves or possibly trade them in the draft of the year we received them for. If that makes sense?

I don’t think this applies anymore. Once picks are acquired they can be used. Seattle can trade Denver’s pick at 5 if they please for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted (edited)

If these teams ahead of us are smart they don’t take back a bunch of picks in this draft from the Panthers to move down.  This is a weak draft and if I am taking calls from the Panthers I want premium players or very high picks like 9, 40 or next years best picks in return 

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Toomers said:

You’re going to have to fill me in on that rule. Never heard any restrictions given to certain picks. 

I'm not sure it's a league rule for certain but it has something to do with making the future pick be determined on the trading teams record and not the team it was originally traded from or some weird accounting trick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WhoKnows
      Joint Practice - Jets

      By WhoKnows · Posted

      Yep. It was an obvious red flag that a lot of people ignored. The results/scores in preseason don’t matter, but individual performance very much does and individually, we looked like the least talented team in the league and it carried over.
    • WhoKnows
      Joint Practice - Jets

      By WhoKnows · Posted

      Sorry, but in 2015, we didn’t look like poo to the extent of 2023. People who said it’s just preseason were completely wrong. Simple as that. 2015 was a veteran lead team. It was Cam’s 5th year and Luke’s 4th. Even our OL was 80% the same (added Oher) as the great run to finish 2014 with a playoff win. That year can be labeled as preseason doesn’t matter because I’m sure we rested vets and well, Ron/Mike weren’t putting in special plays, etc. I absolutely don’t recall a bunch of us saying that Turner was getting killed on one on ones or that Luke was completely out of position or that Norman was hurt again but probably fine. The only thing that was right about the 2023 preseason is that the minority of us who saw it, were correct that we A) should have been making Young and others play 100% of the reps as there was nothing to hide and B) the preseason means nothing was a bunch of BS trying to stay optimistic when it was obvious that we had way less good talent than the rest of the NFL.
    • Panthers Fan 69
      Off-season Thread

      By Panthers Fan 69 · Posted

      You are telling me Paul Maurice is a better coach than Rod??? Yes!!!  It’s because he plays a better system and has a better goalie.   Our system sucks in playoffs and he refuses to roll with Koochie. Dallas cowboys level poo 
×
×
  • Create New...