-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
By HPPantherzfan · Posted
Exactly, like Hill he is just an athlete that happens to be able to throw the ball. I’m sure, with some reps and time, he could catch just fine. That’s why I said “and catch” Taysom Hill has beat the poo out of us and many other teams during the SP years. If we had that!!! Owe Mang! Edit: I’ll add this, 4th and 1 or 2 on the goal line? We would get 6 points with that dude! Edit 2: he may not now or ever be a QB1, but he can avg more than 6 yards per play -
Eh that's debatable at the end of the day. Different schools of thought and whatnot. Generally teams are not overpaying RB's anymore and they don't need to. Most are signing mid-level FA's or drafting them. But they are still fairly important. We have seen one RB drafted in the top 10 in 2025 and an RB just went 3rd overall in the draft a few days ago. You can argue how wise that is but no team generally wants to give an FA RB a huge payday. Yes having a competent and if need be dominant running game is still an asset. The main thing that has changed is how teams invest. -
By XClown1986 · Posted
Except we have him playing safety, so there's that.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.