Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do we have the personnel to Run a 3-4?


bLACKpANTHER
 Share

What 3-4 Lineup do you like best?  

34 members have voted

  1. 1. 3-4 Lineup Options

    • A
      11
    • B
      5
    • C
      13
    • D
      5


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

We can make it work. Burns and Luvu on the edges with Derrick Brown as a 5-tech. We'd need to find another 5-tech and a nose tackle but that can be done in free agency.

Just having Burns play edge in this scheme is going to be worth it, IMO. And don't underestimate Frankie Luvu either.

I agree on Luvu he fits this scheme very nicely. We’ll be in base far less than we’ll be in other looks I wouldn’t get too caught up on the pure 3-4.

We have a lot of versatile pieces that work for both types of defense  but I think our edges other than YGM are all better suited for 3-4 and that’s the harder position to find. Evero is going to have a lot of fun with our athleticism and talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evero said that people make too much of a big deal about the base D because it's used only for a few plays a game, the rest of it is sub packages.

i'd like us to get some power on the other side of burns and some more bulk in the interior, but overall i think it isn't going to be hard to fill holes to fit what Evero wants to do because mostly he's just going to be working around what is here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Evero said that people make too much of a big deal about the base D because it's used only for a few plays a game, the rest of it is sub packages.

i'd like us to get some power on the other side of burns and some more bulk in the interior, but overall i think it isn't going to be hard to fill holes to fit what Evero wants to do because mostly he's just going to be working around what is here.

"I hired a man, not a scheme."

- Frank Reich 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Evero said that people make too much of a big deal about the base D because it's used only for a few plays a game, the rest of it is sub packages.

i'd like us to get some power on the other side of burns and some more bulk in the interior, but overall i think it isn't going to be hard to fill holes to fit what Evero wants to do because mostly he's just going to be working around what is here.

Exactly. We will be running nickel 60% of the time.  One thing this does mean though.... we will need a handful more linebackers. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We definitely have a good start imo but through FA and draft it will be fine. Definitely need to find some bullies on our DL, YGM will just get murdered out there. Want to see if Brandon Smith can make some noise at ILB in a 3-4. Luvu and Burns on the outside excites me. What this team does with Shaq is also a big question mark right now. 

#InEJitrust 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...