Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Todd McShay seems to really like Anthony Richardson


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

Running QBs are great in the short run but if you are going after one to be here 15 years you need the traditional skills as main requirement, the prospect who can beat teams from the pocket without the running threat.  The runners are more likely to get hurt and tires wear off earlier in career typically

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Serious time:

Other than those flashy highlight reels from YT ... just what is it about AR that is blinding some of you? He has barely played two full seasons of college ball. Where does this potential everyone hypes up come from? So much so, you claim he has the most potential out of any QB in the Draft (huge lol btw). Is he tall? Sure ... but not the tallest. Does he have the size? Sure ... but so do others. Does he have a good arm? Yep ... but so do others. Can he run it? Yep. Cool. So ... just what are you AR fans going off of? I really, really want to know.

why bother, its been explained to you ad nauseam, nothing anyone posts is going to change your mind about how good of a prospect he is.  Just know that you are way off on this kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MtnJax said:

Michael Felder, who know a hell of a lot about college football, said on Kyle Bailey’s show that when it comes to AR, he never knows where the ball is going to end up when he throws it. Not sure even Reich could fix that

Sounds like a great choice at 9. I trust Reich but there are a ton of red flags with Richardson. I will be happy when we draft a guy one way or the other, so the board can get behind the new kid. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Shocker said:

AR is some weird Huddle Cam crush thing

 

IMO Stroud is the only sure fire franchise guy.  High floor low ceiling.  He is going to win games.  I call him a kirk cousins clone on steriods.  I love the kid but I seriously doubt there is a reasonable scenario or path for us to draft him. 

 

Then the other 3 all are huge gambles but if it gets to that might as well go big and gamble with the guy with the highest ceiling and that without a shadow of a doubt is AR. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand why our staff would be good for AR, but for our team, I would want the highly accurate QB who can step right in an excel in his 5-yr rookie window with our staff (which will be hard to keep in place to begin with).  Them having to build up a guy from scratch especially to help him become more accurate can be a long process even if it works. Give me the guy who is more prepared to step in immediately and produce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Shocker said:

AR is some weird Huddle Cam crush thing

 

Make a thread about any of the top QBs and you will see similar posts. The Huddle just wants a young talented QB. It’s mostly people not wanting him mentioning Cam. I think Stroud seems to be a Huddle favorite, AR might be the best available at 9.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I have never seen a group of people drool over someone who barely completes half their passes. It’s literally all because we had Cam and they think AR can be the next Cam. In reality, he’s not even close to being as polished as Cam was coming out of school. 

People aren’t thinking Cam they are thinking Josh Allen who, like Richardson, had accuracy issues. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Monty83 said:

…I would want the highly accurate QB who can step right in an excel in his 5-yr rookie window…

…the guy who is more prepared to step in immediately and produce.

I think everyone wants that but which qb in this draft is that? And if anyone truly fits that bill I predict they are long gone before the 9th pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...