Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bears have been approached by multiple teams for #1 Pick and are leaning towards trading the pick away per Adam Schefter


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Won't work well enough. The game has changed. It favors the offense. You try to build a defense like that and roll with a mediocre QB and you're going to get rolled more often than not. 

That Ravens team and season was an anomaly. We rarely see a defense dominate with mediocre QB play because it just doesn't work except in rare circumstances.

Defense doesn't win championships anymore. 

Because there arent any  defenses like that.The mindset and focus has changed, not the principles.The point isnt a mediocre qb, its the desperation and squandering whole team building on a Qb.You can have a great Qb and a great defense and a great oline at the same time if you do things with logic and patience.logic and patience isnt throwing away picks overcand over to hut on a qb.This is especially true in certain weak drafts and this draft is one if those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Shocker said:

I really hope NFL teams pass on Young and he is available at 3.  I am definitely moving up and extremely happy to have him as our franchise QB.  Any player can get hurt but none of these guys are as good as Young

Ive said he was 5'10 all year and you through a conniption fit every time crying he was listed at 6ft.  guess what genius he is 5'10 sub 200lbs.  fug that poo

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Ive said he was 5'10 all year and you through a conniption fit every time crying he was listed at 6ft.  guess what genius he is 5'10 sub 200lbs.  fug that poo

McShay said Young feels pressure well and that is what makes him "special".  Great, but how about his QB passing skills?  It's one thing to know where the pressure is coming from, but the other KEY part is accurately delivering the ball anywhere down the field, sometimes into very tight windows, with timing and anticipation.  Feeling the pressure and escaping it is a wonderful trait, but so is successfully delivering the ball regularly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...