Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson draft stock


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is that media hype that happens every year that im not sure I believe.   He tested great, everyone knew he would.  Im not sure why that would jump him up a lot.  Most nfl teams weigh tape a lot higher than verticals and broad jumps.   Did he help himself?   Sure, I'm just not as sure if its as drastic as everyone getting caught up in the track numbers.  In the throwing drills you could clearly see he needs some work.  Call me crazy but i think a qbs throwing and game tape is a lot more important than their vertical in tights.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

AR is built like Derek Henry.  He is a unicorn QB if he can be developed correctly. Wouldn't shock me if he ends up going #1 overall based on his physical traits.

Derek Henry was a running back.  My qb being built like a running back is the least of my concerns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Richardson was +2200 to be the first QB selected just a couple of weeks ago. Now at +350 I have a cashout option 

I like Stroud at +400 now

I have to believe that’s a Vegas trap. Especially with it being early March. They are taking on the slew of bets coming in from his combine performance. It will all balance out come mid April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, just to remind everyone many people were putting a top 10 grade on Malik Willis last year. don’t get too caught up in the physical attributes hype.

The main point of the combine is to look for red flags, or if you’re 50/50 split on someone too find some sort of deciding factor to pick one over another. That’s it. 

when it comes to QB’s you’re picking them based on 1. Potential 2. Risk. And of their risk of what kind of risk is it?

Only player Richardson has jumped in my opinion is Levis and that’s only because of his super weird milk phobia. That’s a red flag on Levis’s part not due to anything Richardson has done.

my Top 3 QB’s

1. Stround - high potential and lowest risk (has NFL size and skills)

2. Young - Highest potential and moderate risk due to size

3. Hendon Hooker - his main negative are the ACL(which he had a good update at the combine) and his Age.

After that it’s a crap shoot honestly. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I mean, was anyone not expecting this kid to light it up yesterday? That kind of stuff is made for athletes like him. He’s never been questioned as an athlete. He’s been questioned if he can be more accurate in the NFL than he was in college. Not a lot of kids can do that. 

Josh Allen is the only 1 that did it.  His accuracy remains a major concern

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I mean, was anyone not expecting this kid to light it up yesterday? That kind of stuff is made for athletes like him. He’s never been questioned as an athlete. He’s been questioned if he can be more accurate in the NFL than he was in college. Not a lot of kids can do that. 

That’s why in that regard he reminds me of Josh Allen who was also criticized for not being accurate in college. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NAS said:

That’s why in that regard he reminds me of Josh Allen who was also criticized for not being accurate in college. 

I think the comparisons are valid. My hesitation with AR is that Josh is a unicorn in the fact that he got much better in the NFL. That typically does not happen to QBs. At least in terms of accuracy. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hornets shooting has definitely cooled off to end the season 
    • Would be cool if Melo and Kon tied for the season league lead in 3’s.  Either that or Kon straight-up.
    • I love the bottom feeding approach.  Not to say I was the only one, but I was screaming to draft Coker and then screaming to get him in here as an UDFA.  There were criticisms about him, etc.  As a Gamecock baby (Dad was a Tight End for them when I was born) I was against Legette.  I wanted the kid from Georgia.   All that to say this:  I am afraid of drafting a WR (I spent some time today researching) a few of the top names: 1. Jordan Tyson.  MCL, ACL, NHL---he has injured everything he could that ends in "L" and some things not related to his body.  He will drop, and everyone will start getting excited around 15.   NO! take him off the board. 2. KC Concepcion.  I want to like him, but is he not John Metchie III II?  I can't stand drops. To me, the most important characteristic for a receiver is hands.  I do not buy the "He can be taught."  I disagree to a degree.  Catching a football at a high level when you are being hit by someone behind you as you run full speed across the field is more about concentration and focus than anything else. You gotta trust your eyes, your instincts, and your QB.  Hard to teach someone not to fear something that hits you that you cannot see.  Dropping passes gets into your head--that makes you second guess yourself.  if it doesn't, it should.  Either way, it is a mental issue.   3. Omar Cooper.  I like him enough, but at 19? No.  He is a good YAC guy with solid hands.  However, he had a good WR across from him, the best QB in the country, a pretty easy schedule (He had his best games against FCS schools) and I wonder how much of the route tree he ran.  I am torn, not sold.  Of the three just mentioned, he has the worst skillset but I would like him the best as our Z. Who then, do I want, you ask? If it has to be WR, trade back.  If you can't, draft the slow guy who can't get a good release.  1.  Denzel Boston.   If it has to be a WR at 19, I think I would take Denzel Boston.  His biggest criticism is the release (and 40 speed) but he had great hands and runs good routes. as the Z, which is what we need, he would be perfect because he could motion toward the LOS and even when on the LOS, he is off the ball.  Lets do some bottom fishing in Coker Lake: Round 2: Ted Hurst.  He is a model Z WR for this offense.  Drops too many balls to my liking, but as a second rounder, I can tolerate that a bit more than a first rounder.  Round 5: Kendrick Law (UK):  This is the guy I am most comfortable drafting.  His average route at KY was under 4 yards.  He is great at running after the catch.  Stats? don't look at the game stats--look at the measurables. A 42-inch vertical, a 10-foot-8 broad jump, and a 9.60 Relative Athletic Score place him among the most explosive receivers in this class. That kind of lower-body power, paired with his balance through contact and proven ability to generate yards after the catch, gives him a real foundation to develop beyond what Kentucky asked of him. I think they were considering drafting a WR in the first round.  I get it, but as with the tackles in round 1, "Buyer Beware."  I have not given up on XL but I am very concerned that his mind is not right for the NFL. 
×
×
  • Create New...