Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why do we have negative Nancy’s about trading for #1?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

You’re really worked over DJ Moore who’s basically a smidge better than Gabe Davis?

 

WRs can be had as FAs or cheap trades, in fact I’m glad we kept a third 1st round pick!!!

 

in case you’ve missed, we haven’t had a solid QB1 since 2018, 4 years of disastrous QB play

 

 instead of hoping or settling Carolina got aggressive and I’m honestly surprised at the trade package we didn’t give up more.

They got stupid.3 more yrs of disaster in the way.When they finally realize it we will need oline and

d line overhaul along with a qb.desperation on parade.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jasonluckydog said:

 I wanted a vet qb like Carr and see what this staff can do with a player like Corral.

Absolutely nothing, just like he has shown during his entire career.

Carr is a lot closer to Sam Darnold than a guy that can win a SB.

And Matt Corral can hopefully develop into a decent backup.  With 17 games, you need a backup that can win a game or two

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, BrianS said:

The way I look at it is that we traded away two first round picks for the number one pick.  The other stuff isn't really all that worrisome - including DJ Moore.

You're going to give any first round rookie QB at least two years anyway.  By the time we find out what our rookie has (or doesn't have) we'll have a first round pick again.  I just don't see the problem.

Honestly just one first rounder lost and this year's first rounders swapped.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Disclaimer:  In June, I am usually optimistic.  In October, a policeman with a bullhorn is telling me that I have a lot of life ahead of me and to think about my loved ones as I gaze down upon him from my rooftop.   Having said that, I think our offense (down the stretch) was good enough to play KC and Philly tough.  So how many games would this offense have won if they played the entire season like they did in November-January and if they had a better defense?   If you could stretch the last nine games over an entire season and put a solid defense on the other side, I see 5 wins becoming 7 or 8.  Down the stretch, the Panther D surrendered 30 points or more in 5 of the final 7 games and managed to win 2 of those 5.  If they can win 40% of games in which their defense surrenders 30 points or more, then the math indicates, had that been the case all season, the Panthers should have won 6 or 7 games with their defense surrendering 30+ points.   This season, we are much better at WR (TMac, Renfrow, Horn, and I expect XL to be a lot better).  Bryce is confident and now a leader.    The Achilles' heel of the 2024 defense, the DL, seems to be very solid.  We got back Horn and Jackson on the corners, Smith-Wade is improving better than expected, we signed a stud Safety.  Derrick Brown returns.  While the D is not there yet, it is going to be better.   So if we ended the second half of 2024 playing at a level that should have produced 6-7 wins, better WRs and a better defense could result in 9 wins or more.       
    • Let's not ger greedy....I'll say 5 😉
×
×
  • Create New...