Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers sign Vonn Bell


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, UNCrules2187 said:

So in a 3-4 base I'm thinking:

Brown - Tuttle - ???

Burns - Shaq - Chinn - Luvu on early downs / Burns - Shaq - Luvu - Haynes on obvious pass rush downs?

Horn - Woods - Bell - Jackson

If Chinn puts on some weight having him and Shaq in the middle could be nasty!  Also Barno is going to get some more playing time in the 3-4 IMO.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

So in a 3-4 base I'm thinking:

Brown - Tuttle - ???

Burns - Shaq - Chinn - Luvu on early downs / Burns - Shaq - Luvu - Haynes on obvious pass rush downs?

Horn - Woods - Bell - Jackson

I’m guessing:

Brown - McCall/someone not on the team - Tuttle

Burns - Shaq - Chinn - Luvu/Haynes/Barno

Horn - Woods - Bell - Jackson

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Does this signal Chinn to LB? I really thought we'd be looking for a true over the top FS, not another SS.

Or is Chinn gonna get shopped to recoup some draft capital?

 

Frank or Fitt one said we wanted a fast linebacker.  Chinn runs sub 4.5 iirc. 

Like the way the defense is setting up.  Fast and hard hitting.  Bell and Chinn on the same D is fun to think about

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheWiz said:

Somebody who understands the 3-4 scheme explain to me what this means for Jeremy Chinn without using Chap GPT.

I won't pretend I know it all, but our expected base package is a two-high safety approach so Woods & Bell will be those outfielders with one sometimes a robber.

                     Woods -- Bell

Horn                                             Jackson

         Burns - Shaq - Chinn? - Luvu

                Brown - Tuttle - <TBD>

 

Now, this may only end up being 25-30% of our formations, but if we're keeping Chinn and want him in 90%+ of defensive snaps, that's kind of where he'll need to go at times.  Unless you want him deep.  

People will say he fits this hybrid but they aren't accounting for a good fraction of our anticipated defensive looks.

He'll be akin to the hybrid role with a thousand nicknames otherwise in our nickel and dime subs.  

 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

So in a 3-4 base I'm thinking:

Brown - Tuttle - ???

Burns - Shaq - Chinn - Luvu on early downs / Burns - Shaq - Luvu - Haynes on obvious pass rush downs?

Horn - Woods - Bell - Jackson

If that’s the case then Chinn is getting traded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Does this signal Chinn to LB? I really thought we'd be looking for a true over the top FS, not another SS.

Or is Chinn gonna get shopped to recoup some draft capital?

Same and I have the same question as well

Chinn being on his last year of his rookie deal probably means we won’t fetch much for him. Imo I think we’d get more value from moving him to LB than trading him for picks and taking our chances in the draft or spend more money on another LB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • at some point, though, you just have to suck it up and accept it and deal with the bad deal you got.  you go through funks where you keep making mistakes and hope that you get it figured out sometime soon, but in the learning process you realize you could have done some things better but you're stuck with decisions you make. you have two choices...whine about it or just brush it off and hope can make the situation you put yourself work. i know a lot of people in here have probably never experienced or dealt with failure much in their lives, but i have and i learned to just suck it up and try to make the best of the situation you've got yourself in because you realize that you're stuck with it for a while. doesn't do any good to keep harping over what you wish you had done better. you already know that. now it's just about moving forward from here and making the best of it and hoping you can make something of it. it's the easiest thing in the world to look at where Bryce falls short...and yes, that was intentional. everyone knows that and all that is done is beating that horse laying on the ground. what takes some work is trying to see how it can work and if they have done and are doing things to help the situation get better. 
    • I completely agree. Guys like David Carr and Darnold have all the potential in the world but really could have benefited from sitting for a few years.
    • I will go to my grave thinking that some qbs simply need to sit for a spell and not start immediately and that having multiple head coaches and oc's in the first few years is a sure fire way to ruin a qb.  Having to learn new schemes, new terminology etc while having to learn to lead in the nfl is simply too much for the majority of qbs.  I know it sucks for the fans but look at KC situation.  That had a great vet mentor to mahoomes and simply let him learn with absolutely no pressure in his rookie year.  Not sure why more teams are not following that model.
×
×
  • Create New...