Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers showing interest in RB Jamaal Williams


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

we made him an offer. if he wants to be here so bad then all he has to do is docusign it.

When was the offer? I know we supposedly made an offer a few days ago, but Sheena Quick is implying we just made one. I could be reading her tweet wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Xtreme said:

When was the offer? I know we supposedly made an offer a few days ago, but Sheena Quick is implying we just made one. I could be reading her tweet wrong. 

There was an article on the team site the other day that said we had offers on the table for Bozeman and foreman.

one player has since signed, but one player hasn’t…so the ball is in foreman’s hands (pun intended)

Edited by therealmjl
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Jamaal Williams commands 5 million or less a season on no more than a 2 year contract, I could see the Panthers interest.

But if he gets more elsewhere, then good for him. We don't want to overpay.

The FA RB pool is large and the draft is deep at RB. There will be a large supply of RBs out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, rodeo said:

he seems to be a bit of a touchdown vulture judging from his highlights. almost all of his TDs are from within the 5 and there were only a handful of big runs in the open field.

I've noticed a pattern with these FA interests.  Everyone them are known for scoring TDS.  Our guys are known for yards but few TDS. I'm smelling what Fitterer and Reich are cooking. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like Williams as a team leader and positive locker room presence; I'm a big fan and would be happy to have him as a Panther. But he's not a game changer as a running back and we certainly shouldn't break the bank for him. Hopefully the market dictates he and/or Foreman getting a very modest deal

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rodeo said:

he seems to be a bit of a touchdown vulture judging from his highlights. almost all of his TDs are from within the 5 and there were only a handful of big runs in the open field.

Yes, and signing him for that reason makes a lot of sense.

Stroud doesn't (even try) score with his legs and no one wants Young to go for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, rodeo said:

he seems to be a bit of a touchdown vulture judging from his highlights. almost all of his TDs are from within the 5 and there were only a handful of big runs in the open field.

Thats the entire point.

Not to mention he had plenty of touches. Heck his rushing yards are just short of the leading receivers yardage. He was the second most productive player in the team in yards and we'll above the third place.

How does he remotely qualify as a TD vulture?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...