Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marc Ryan - "Carolina Zeroed in on Stroud and Richardson"


CPcavedweller
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Yeah, I can tell you don't watch the games because you refer specifically to college statistics instead of evaluating what's happening in each player's games.

I don't really care either way. You can go back to evaluating quarterbacks you find the hottest for all I care.

You can tell this and you can tell that.. Got it..

At what point do you recognize the numbers and why they are so bad for a QB being looked at as a top 5 pick??? When does that be something you can tell??

If college numbers don’t matter why even keep records of them???

I should never see you use numbers in a debate because you watch the game and saw all the outliers and intangible situations.. (The Qb broke up with his girlfriend before the game that’s why he went 6 - 17 with no TDS vs a 1-11 mid major ) Got you..

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/gamelog/_/id/4429084/anthony-richardson
 

go down this list and explain why he only completed 48% his passes when he had to see UGA..  He had a bad breakfast right?? Lmao

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

You can tell this and you can tell that.. Got it..

At what point do you recognize the numbers and why they are so bad for a QB being looked at as a top 5 pick??? When does that be something you can tell??

If college numbers don’t matter why even keep records of them???

I should never see you use numbers in a debate because you watch the game and saw all the outliers and intangible situations.. (The Qb broke up with his girlfriend before the game that’s why he went 6 - 17 with no TDS vs a 1-11 mid major ) Got you..

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/gamelog/_/id/4429084/anthony-richardson
 

go down this list and explain why he only completed 48% his passes when he had to see UGA..  He had a bad breakfast right?? Lmao

 

that line he was behind couldn't hold UGA defense for 🤫🙊, and guess what they still had a hard time bringing him down. Give him Alabama or Ohio State line big difference.

And his receivers couldn't get any separation 

 

Edited by Bluetooth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bluetooth said:

that line he was behind couldn't hold UGA defense for 🤫🙊, and guess what they still had a hard time bringing him down. Give him Alabama or Ohio State line big difference.

And his receivers couldn't get any separation 

 

What was his excuses vs Kentucky ??

14 35 143 40.0 0 2 28 1 62.9 2.6 6 4 0.7 0 4

 

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Sub Zero said:

Dalton isn’t even getting a press conference and he signed today .. If they planned on him being the starter he would get more media attention..More and More it looks like the Vet Mentor and not the bridge guy waiting for the young guy to be ready…

They are drafting a day 1 starter..

Unless it's a

 never ending loop GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm almost starting to think that Richardson is our target and that's why we'd consider trading down a spot or two. We'd still be thrilled with Stroud and Young but we're really tempted to take a shot on Richardson's immense talent... but we're scared of being kicked like SF was with Mac Jones. Signing an Andy Dalton means you're not forced to play him right away.

I agree. Something tells me it’s Richardson with Dalton letting him sit the first 8 games or so. I still think it’s Stroud, but the nagging feeling that it’s Richardson is growing stronger each day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just fyi, Marc Ryan is a laughing stock to every other media personality in the state.  The guy is literally never right on anything and spends half of his day arguing with people on twitter who are constantly bumping old tweets of something he said that turned out to be complete b/s

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Sub Zero said:

You can tell this and you can tell that.. Got it..

At what point do you recognize the numbers and why they are so bad for a QB being looked at as a top 5 pick??? When does that be something you can tell??

If college numbers don’t matter why even keep records of them???

I should never see you use numbers in a debate because you watch the game and saw all the outliers and intangible situations.. (The Qb broke up with his girlfriend before the game that’s why he went 6 - 17 with no TDS vs a 1-11 mid major ) Got you..

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/gamelog/_/id/4429084/anthony-richardson
 

go down this list and explain why he only completed 48% his passes when he had to see UGA..  He had a bad breakfast right?? Lmao

 

To be clear only Stroud and Richardson, period, had 250+ yards, at least one passing touchdown and no interceptions against UGA this year. That’s it. Anybody who watches Florida football year round knows this was the worst pass catching group of players we have had in ages. Both in the ability to separate and the ability to hold onto the ball. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...