Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marc Ryan - "Carolina Zeroed in on Stroud and Richardson"


CPcavedweller
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Yeah, I can tell you don't watch the games because you refer specifically to college statistics instead of evaluating what's happening in each player's games.

I don't really care either way. You can go back to evaluating quarterbacks you find the hottest for all I care.

You can tell this and you can tell that.. Got it..

At what point do you recognize the numbers and why they are so bad for a QB being looked at as a top 5 pick??? When does that be something you can tell??

If college numbers don’t matter why even keep records of them???

I should never see you use numbers in a debate because you watch the game and saw all the outliers and intangible situations.. (The Qb broke up with his girlfriend before the game that’s why he went 6 - 17 with no TDS vs a 1-11 mid major ) Got you..

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/gamelog/_/id/4429084/anthony-richardson
 

go down this list and explain why he only completed 48% his passes when he had to see UGA..  He had a bad breakfast right?? Lmao

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

You can tell this and you can tell that.. Got it..

At what point do you recognize the numbers and why they are so bad for a QB being looked at as a top 5 pick??? When does that be something you can tell??

If college numbers don’t matter why even keep records of them???

I should never see you use numbers in a debate because you watch the game and saw all the outliers and intangible situations.. (The Qb broke up with his girlfriend before the game that’s why he went 6 - 17 with no TDS vs a 1-11 mid major ) Got you..

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/gamelog/_/id/4429084/anthony-richardson
 

go down this list and explain why he only completed 48% his passes when he had to see UGA..  He had a bad breakfast right?? Lmao

 

that line he was behind couldn't hold UGA defense for 🤫🙊, and guess what they still had a hard time bringing him down. Give him Alabama or Ohio State line big difference.

And his receivers couldn't get any separation 

 

Edited by Bluetooth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bluetooth said:

that line he was behind couldn't hold UGA defense for 🤫🙊, and guess what they still had a hard time bringing him down. Give him Alabama or Ohio State line big difference.

And his receivers couldn't get any separation 

 

What was his excuses vs Kentucky ??

14 35 143 40.0 0 2 28 1 62.9 2.6 6 4 0.7 0 4

 

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Sub Zero said:

Dalton isn’t even getting a press conference and he signed today .. If they planned on him being the starter he would get more media attention..More and More it looks like the Vet Mentor and not the bridge guy waiting for the young guy to be ready…

They are drafting a day 1 starter..

Unless it's a

 never ending loop GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm almost starting to think that Richardson is our target and that's why we'd consider trading down a spot or two. We'd still be thrilled with Stroud and Young but we're really tempted to take a shot on Richardson's immense talent... but we're scared of being kicked like SF was with Mac Jones. Signing an Andy Dalton means you're not forced to play him right away.

I agree. Something tells me it’s Richardson with Dalton letting him sit the first 8 games or so. I still think it’s Stroud, but the nagging feeling that it’s Richardson is growing stronger each day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just fyi, Marc Ryan is a laughing stock to every other media personality in the state.  The guy is literally never right on anything and spends half of his day arguing with people on twitter who are constantly bumping old tweets of something he said that turned out to be complete b/s

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Sub Zero said:

You can tell this and you can tell that.. Got it..

At what point do you recognize the numbers and why they are so bad for a QB being looked at as a top 5 pick??? When does that be something you can tell??

If college numbers don’t matter why even keep records of them???

I should never see you use numbers in a debate because you watch the game and saw all the outliers and intangible situations.. (The Qb broke up with his girlfriend before the game that’s why he went 6 - 17 with no TDS vs a 1-11 mid major ) Got you..

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/gamelog/_/id/4429084/anthony-richardson
 

go down this list and explain why he only completed 48% his passes when he had to see UGA..  He had a bad breakfast right?? Lmao

 

To be clear only Stroud and Richardson, period, had 250+ yards, at least one passing touchdown and no interceptions against UGA this year. That’s it. Anybody who watches Florida football year round knows this was the worst pass catching group of players we have had in ages. Both in the ability to separate and the ability to hold onto the ball. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • By all indications, the surgery was "minor." I know with all surgeries and especially back surgery there can be complications, but I think the whole time Tremble did this with the expectation he would be able to be back for Week 1 It sounds like he will be ready to start back in team drills next week. He's a veteran who knows the system so I'm sure that helps. I still can't imagine he will play a normal workload early on though 
    • Maybe. He was pretty good in college before a bad injury. He had a good preseason last year as a UDFA in Washington and was on their practice squad all year so they obviously saw something worth developing. He signed a futures deal with the Panthers earlier this year, and everything about him has been increasingly positive. Tremayne has gotten a decent amount of time with the ones, and a lot with the twos for someone that doesn't have a chance. He's the only other 6'4" plus WR on the team, plays ST, and is a more natural backup to the X receiver position than David Moore. That was my thinking behind it. But he may well end up as one of the last roster cuts. If so, I do hope they can bring him back to the PS. But I personally think there's a good chance he could be claimed given his ST ability and what hes shown at WR.
    • That was my thought originally, but so many of the beat writers have mentioned keeping 7 WRs in conversations that I went with that, at least for the purposes of this projection. But you're right that historically defensive guys who were standouts at ST have tradionally gotten those last spots  
×
×
  • Create New...