Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fanbase Temperature Gauge: Who do you like and who do you want? (3/21/23)


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Who is the better QB prospect?  

355 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the better QB prospect?

    • Bryce Young
      103
    • CJ Stroud
      134
    • Both are equally good
      118
  2. 2. Which QB do you WANT us to draft?

    • Bryce Young
      69
    • CJ Stroud
      179
    • I'm good with either
      96
    • Chaos (Levis or Richardson)
      11

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

Heard Todd McShay discussing how quickly Stroud processes and then shift to hit WRs with dimes. We have not seen that around here in a long time. 

Yeah that's another thing.  Stroud isn't a bad processer.  In fact he is very good at it.  He had the top rating in all of the NCAA last year.  Does Young have the edge in processing? Probably, but I've also seen him miss open looks due to lack of vision.  @Wes21posted several clips of this I believe.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Brent Gregory said:

If Bryce young were 3 inches taller and 15 pounds heavier I'd be absolutely ecstatic over him but he's not. Stroud has the natural size you like and great stats. That being said Stroud is the safe choice. 

I know what you are saying--but hear me out--in part, I agree with every word.  David Carr, Mark Sanchez, Sam Darnold, Blaine Gabbart, EJ Manual, Blake Bortles, etc. all had the size and the tools.  The real question was processing speed--they all seemed to struggle to go through their progressions and make a timely, accurate throw.  We know we have a QB who can do that in Young.  Do we in Stroud?  I would say there is a strong chance he can do it, just to a slightly lesser degree (or he was never asked to do it as Young was).  We know Young's size and his processing speed, for the most part--what we need to know is about Stroud.  If Stroud can come close to equalling Young, you take him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chaos said:

Since I honestly don't know, I kind of wish the Panthers had the second pick in the draft so we eliminate the chance of making the wrong selection.

It don't matter which pick in the draft fi we are at the top of the whole thing. We can get any pick we want pretty much and still get who we want. We will not make any errors on who our pick will be. With the more competent staff we have now things should run smoothly and get what we actually need to fill the holes in both lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, WestPanthers said:

And that is weird that Panthers youtube channel just posted the D.J mock draft 3.0 on their channel which mock Bryce Young is the No1 Pick for us....Hmmmmmnnnn....

 

The social media team has no idea who we are taking 1st

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DavidEng said:

Stroud - more interceptions than Young (per game avg)

I agree with this 

Mainly because CJ is very aggressive pushing the ball downfield. I feel like CJ may have some crazy interception games as a rookie. With a couple games of 2 or 3 int’s. He’ll put up touchdowns and yards too but it’ll take him a year or two to figure out when to be aggressive and when not to

Young is definitely the more conservative of the two. I could see something like a 24 touchdown 8 interception type season from BY his rookie season

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

The social media team has no idea who we are taking 1st

Honestly, they actually know A LOT. They’re the ones filming all the behind the scene stuff you see after the draft and the ones prepping pieces to come out immediately after we draft a guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I know what you are saying--but hear me out--in part, I agree with every word.  David Carr, Mark Sanchez, Sam Darnold, Blaine Gabbart, EJ Manual, Blake Bortles, etc. all had the size and the tools.  The real question was processing speed--they all seemed to struggle to go through their progressions and make a timely, accurate throw.  We know we have a QB who can do that in Young.  Do we in Stroud?  I would say there is a strong chance he can do it, just to a slightly lesser degree (or he was never asked to do it as Young was).  We know Young's size and his processing speed, for the most part--what we need to know is about Stroud.  If Stroud can come close to equalling Young, you take him.

I get what you are saying but what makes people think Stroud isn’t as good at processing and progressions? I’ve seen him drop back and go through his reads on the regular while putting up great numbers.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...