Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other NFL Fans are Still Dismissing the Panthers Offseason Moves?


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Hoenheim said:

I've been noticing this a lot this off season. I don't understand how the Bears are almost universally praised while all the moves the Panthers made are unilaterally dismissed by non Panther fans (fans of other teams). 

Is it because we've been irrelevant for so long for 5 years? Or what?

It's like they find every possible flaw or negative possible in our moves and think we'll still find a way to suck.

Maybe our team just has to prove it on the field to get some respect. But I remember during 2015 people still fugin hated the Panthers 🤣  what is the deal man 

We need multiple winning seasons and super bowl wins for some street cred. Apparently. 

I think if you gave our situation to almost any team that sucked last season they'd be hooping and hollering . fug man.

What team in the NFC really striking fear in your heart right now? They might be laughing at us maybe they should be laughing at themselves. 

Yeah, if I was a neutral eval I would bet a lot on the Panthers, easy wins this season just like 2015. But being a fan I might just have rose tinted glasses and I'm just setting myself up to lose money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

The Panthers didn’t even exist yet when the Bears accomplished all of those things.

Since 95 The Panthers have appeared in 2 Superbowls compared to the bears 1 and have won their division 6 times to the bears 5.

Also since 95 the Panthers have 9 playoff wins to the Bears 3. 
 

The Panthers have clearly been the better team since their inception.

The Panthers have 8 playoff wins not 9. The Bears had been to 2 SB's. One in 86(won it) and one in 06(lost it). The Bears have 8 playoff wins and NFL history can't change and it don't matter if they were here long before us. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

The Panthers have 8 playoff wins not 9. The Bears had been to 2 SB's. One in 86(won it) and one in 06(lost it). The Bears have 8 playoff wins and NFL history can't change and it don't matter if they were here long before us. 

Panthers have 9 playoff wins and 8 losses.

The Panthers have only been around since 1995. Sorry, if I am going to compare team success relative to the Panthers I’m not going to take things into consideration before the Panthers became a franchise.

Have the Bears in general been a successful franchise yes, but since 1995 not so much. Since 1995 the Bears have an overall record of 204-246 and the Panthers are 212-237-1

The Panthers have been better than the Bears since their inception in 1995.

Edited by Eazy-E
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
    • I don't know. CMC is like others and may have lip serviced that line of " I had no plan or wanted to leave Carolina" I think he even said he bought a house too and wanted this to be home.   Here's what I heard- In a way Panthers org gave him a test and he didn't "fight" back. They approached CMC and told him they wanted to put him on IR since the "season" was over or out of playoff reach. CMC didn't fight it one lick and agreed. They secretly wanted him to kept playing or want to, but there was no kickback. I honestly don't know if its real or not, 5th hand information type deal doing on. Yes he had bruises and pains, but was able to play...... but went along with Panthers staff. Odd to be playing games with star players, but whatever....   Plus the staff doctors found out about his tendinitis and there was nothing to fix it. Even with him missing time, it was the best move to trade him before he got inflamed constantly.    Lastly, its mostly time a combo of stuff, Fitterererere did not sign him to be the highest paid RB. That was classic Marty "give me a" herniay doing. GMs have different values on roster spots and rumor was Fitterererer was one that didn't want to pay RBs. For all his faults, he's right about that......
×
×
  • Create New...