Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coleridge Bernard Stroud IV

GOAT

By GOAT,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
rodeo Veteran

rodeo

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

man you guys getting into draft hostilities are gonna feel so awkward when we draft the other one, regardless of who it is.

i still have awkward emotions thinking back to backing up @Panthro in threads about how much Luke Kuechly is just a pile jumper and we shouldn't touch him.

  • Pie 18
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GOAT Veteran

GOAT

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, jfra78 said:

Think Shaq gives up his number?  He already gave us a year free.

I think Stroud should rock 14 cause his success will be tied to Reich's

yeah, that free year could have him wanting Stroud to pay up for #7 with his fat new #1 pick contract / bonus.

Shaq will probably be stoked to wear 54 again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhoKnows Grand Master

WhoKnows

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, rodeo said:

man you guys getting into draft hostilities are gonna feel so awkward when we draft the other one, regardless of who it is.

i still have awkward emotions thinking back to backing up @Panthro in threads about how much Luke Kuechly is just a pile jumper and we shouldn't touch him.

If we end up picking the wrong QB, this place is going to be awful. Every thread is going to have these posts:

1) I knew we should have taken X, he’s leading the Texans to the SB.

2) We told you Fitterer sucked.

3) At least Rhule only traded a 2nd for Darnold.

4) We could have gotten Williams (or Maye) with our 2024 1st.

5) We should have traded Burns because X has no weapons aside from a constantly hurt WR and two old farts.

This place will be an utter mess so I really hope we pick the right QB, just for sanity’s sake.

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Moorgan Enthusiast

Moorgan

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, rodeo said:

man you guys getting into draft hostilities are gonna feel so awkward when we draft the other one, regardless of who it is.

i still have awkward emotions thinking back to backing up @Panthro in threads about how much Luke Kuechly is just a pile jumper and we shouldn't touch him.

Remember when we traded up to get our QB of the future?

I was so excited to get that QB from Notre Dame.

5BDEB9F8-7B0F-4C0F-8094-1C48414DCE0C.gif

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KatsAzz Grand Master

KatsAzz

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, KillerKat said:

If he picked #4 it would already be on the jersey.

I am rooting for the Panthers to draft C.J. Stroud.  If this happens I will rush to purchase a Stroud Jersey.

Here's hoping the Panthers select him and I don't get disappointed. 

However, I will still be happy if the Panthers draft Bryce Young, who could turn out great.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...