Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cynthia Frelund with an interesting analytics look at CJ Stroud and Bryce Young


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

I also remember Darnold getting crushed a few times waiting so long...can't wait to see Young get bear hugged by a 6'5 340 lb dude.

That's my concern.  Banking on a young QB that is 5' 10-1/2 and probably legitimately 195 is a big gamble. 

I know, the NFL protects QBs but that is about like finding out the local police department  closes 97% of homocide cases.  Great, and it probably cuts down on murder, but it doesn't mean much for those attending the funeral, nor fans seeing the penalty flag next to the guy stretched out on the field.

Young is going to get hit, and his general build raises concerns about his ability to withstand it.

I won't be upset if they draft him, but I will hold my breath every time he gets wallopped, penalty flag or no.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

That's my concern.  Banking on a young QB that is 5' 10-1/2 and probably legitimately 195 is a big gamble. 

I know, the NFL protects QBs but that is about like finding out the local police department  closes 97% of homocide cases.  Great, and it probably cuts down on murder, but it doesn't mean much for those attending the funeral, nor fans seeing the penalty flag next to the guy stretched out on the field.

Young is going to get hit, and his general build raises concerns about his ability to withstand it.

I won't be upset if they draft him, but I will hold my breath every time he gets wallopped, penalty flag or no.

Well if you listen to some folks here bc bigger frame QB's have gotten injured too that somehow means it won't happen to Bryce Young. Which is bizarre to say the least because if I'm looking at the situation I'm saying the opposite. Seeing someone like Darnold get sent to IR by the Falcons tells me all I need to know about the likelihood of one the smaller framed QB's in recent years surviving a 10+ year career without accumulating some injuries along the way. If he's your guy in my mind you have to change your offensive approach not just in game planning but you need an even heavier emphasis on offensive line. And even then there are still going to be  certain situations where you are simply at a disadvantage. Like QB sneaks in short yardage situations which Reich likes to run if I'm not mistaken. That's not happening with Young.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/31/2023 at 4:40 AM, rayzor said:

Stroud is the safest bet of this class because of his style of play and his approach to the game.

Like I've said many times, I'd be thrilled as can be to have either him or Young and maybe even AR, because I think all 3 could be special if put in the correct situation (and I think ours is the best one any of them could hope for). 

But AR and Young are more of a gamble than Stroud. 

I wish we just had one more season of tape on AR. I ain’t gonna lie dudes built like a beast. But you don’t draft projects 1 overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

I wish we just had one more season of tape on AR. I ain’t gonna lie dudes built like a beast. But you don’t draft projects 1 overall.

If you do, you better be beyond confident that 1) he can be the greatest and 2) you've got what it takes to get him there. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, rayzor said:

If you do, you better be beyond confident that 1) he can be the greatest and 2) you've got what it takes to get him there. 

This. I think a lot of people have forgotten because of how good he turned out to be right away that Cam was considered a project too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sgt Schultz said:

That's my concern.  Banking on a young QB that is 5' 10-1/2 and probably legitimately 195 is a big gamble. 

I know, the NFL protects QBs but that is about like finding out the local police department  closes 97% of homocide cases.  Great, and it probably cuts down on murder, but it doesn't mean much for those attending the funeral, nor fans seeing the penalty flag next to the guy stretched out on the field.

Young is going to get hit, and his general build raises concerns about his ability to withstand it.

I won't be upset if they draft him, but I will hold my breath every time he gets wallopped, penalty flag or no.

You also have to think that in the NFL, probably half of the DE's and all linebackers will be just as fast as he is. So his mobility isn't going to be nearly as much of an advantage at this level. Add in the fact that he's got Jimmy Clausen Arm strength and I'd be worried. You also saw the drop off between last year and this year after he lost two first round receivers, even with a Kamara clan in Gibbs and the still, Uber talented receivers Bama has.

Maybe the experts have it right but man, trading all of what we did to move up and rolling the dice on Young breaking the mold? We rolled the dice on Cam because he, at the time, was a unicorn, much like Richardson but with much better mechanics. 

You're on the opposite end of the spectrum with Bryce where he has to do everything in spite of his size and lack of elite traits. I'm just not buying that Levis, Richardson, and Stroud wouldn't have done just as well if not better than Young if they were at Bama. Thats the thing. 

If you substitute any one of these QB's for each other, what would it look like? Levis has the arm and some of his throws are very NFL-esque where he is holding safeties with his eyes then making the throw 0.5 seconds later to a tiny opening. He's making timing throws, reading and holding safeties, calling protections and audibles, playing with half as much talent at Kentucky as Young has had.

I don't know man. My order would be Stroud, Levis, Richardson, Haener, Hooker, Young. I can bookmark this to revisit in December but I really think, in terms of NFL success, that's what it's going to look like. If Levis falls and I'm the Steelers, I may even consider picking him up in the 1st and offloading Pickett. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This. I think a lot of people have forgotten because of how good he turned out to be right away that Cam was considered a project too.

Cam had66.1% completion percentage with 30 td's and 7 ints and 1473 yds rushing.

AR had 53.8% completion percentage with 17td's and 9 ints and 654 yds rushing.

 

Both may have been projects but AR is a much bigger and more difficult project. Cam took over games all by himself and dominated in college. AR looked good against Utah and then horrible when it really counted. Cam's AU was much better than AR's UF but still. Not remotely close as candidates.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

Cam had66.1% completion percentage with 30 td's and 7 ints and 1473 yds rushing.

AR had 53.8% completion percentage with 17td's and 9 ints and 654 yds rushing.

 

Both may have been projects but AR is a much bigger and more difficult project. Cam took over games all by himself and dominated in college. AR looked good against Utah and then horrible when it really counted. Cam's AU was much better than AR's UF but still. Not remotely close as candidates.

Yeah, no doubt Cam was a much better college player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This. I think a lot of people have forgotten because of how good he turned out to be right away that Cam was considered a project too.

That's true. But I think he was a lot further along in his development and ability than AR. People made a big deal about him only having one year starting experience in the NCAA, but I think that one year at Blinn also helped him a lot and he went undefeated there and at Auburn setting records. And he's pretty much the reason both programs went undefeated. 

Cam had more at the table in college and the pros than AR, but Cam was also 2 years older than AR is going into the draft. 

AR is green, but he's also incredibly young too. The video of him with Mooch in the QB room where he has to recollect a play exactly after a little conversation impressed the hell out of me. The guy has it clicking in his head and I think I  that regard I think he's more prepared for the pros than Cam was. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

Cam had66.1% completion percentage with 30 td's and 7 ints and 1473 yds rushing.

AR had 53.8% completion percentage with 17td's and 9 ints and 654 yds rushing.

 

Both may have been projects but AR is a much bigger and more difficult project. Cam took over games all by himself and dominated in college. AR looked good against Utah and then horrible when it really counted. Cam's AU was much better than AR's UF but still. Not remotely close as candidates.

Cam was also older and more experienced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not necessarily trying to be flippant, but Morgan has been telling you what type of team he's trying to to build. So, if you have no idea, you just haven't been listening. @ForJimmy explained it pretty well. But, if you don't believe that, then all you have to do is go back and listen to all of the pressers since Morgan was promoted. Then go back and listen to Dave Canales' pressers since he's been here. Don't forget to listen to the pressers during the draft. You're complaining because you don't agree with the player---or perhaps players that were drafted, the mail one being X. I have consistently said that they should draft the player with the most upside, and that you can't limit your draft based upon perceived limitations (especially perceived limitations based upon some fans) of your QB, particularly if the QB is unproven. X has the most upside, and he needs to be developed for sure, but what you obviously fail to realize is that all of the receivers that we could've picked were "projects," save for maybe Ladd who is smallish, has an injury history, and would have offered some redundancy with what we already have. Most people consider him a slot guy. We already have guys that can play in the slot.  If anything, our choices in the draft probably mean that Mingo is solidly in the long term plans. Whether he succeeds or not will be on him for the most part, as well as the coaches to put him in his best position to succeed. Regarding that, he likely needs to be transitioned to the slot where I'm pretty sure some teams (the Steelers being one of them) would have placed him in had he been available. What we also have is JT Sanders who will be another tough competitor on our side at the catch point. He is big-bodied with high upside, and will provide even another potential beast in the second and third level, and another consistent option for our QB (and any QB).  Morgan and Canales obvious put a premium on receivers that can make tough catches, but that doesn't mean that these guys can't be polished up and coached up where necessary. But even if I look at a worse case scenario, if a wideout can make a tough catch, in the mold of Alshon Jeffrey or even Tee Higgins, then YAC is not as important. But the fact is, that both of our newly drafted wideouts have upside to be YAC monsters. So many people were banging the table for a center. I've said it all the way through: apparently our FO on down believes that AC can be a proficient center. It s not like he hasn't played it before. Moreover, we found out (and some of us already knew) that BC could be a backup. Well that's the plan. Until proven otherwise, I'm going to have faith that Canales and Joe Gilbert (as well as Dan Morgan) know what they're doing in that regard. I could be wrong, but I'm thinking that our O-line should at least be average. We'll find out, but I trust that this is not going to be an excuse for Bryce not to succeed in 2024. You've already seen the investment in the O-line, and in the offensive weapons. But Morgan also invested in the defense. We were decent last season, but inconsistent which lead to us being gashed. But the lack of offense also lead to the defense being gassed, which of course leads to being gashed as well. With the addition of the rookies and the additions of Robinson and Jewell, Fuller and of course Clowney and Wonnum, getting gashed in the run game will hopefully be a thing of the past. But the fact is that you can't fix everything in one offseason. However, if you can't see the plan and the vision, you just don't want to see it.   
    • I see it like this:  Can Coker beat out Terrace Marshall Jr?  Can Pinkey beat out Smith-Marsette (since Legette can return kicks) or Jonathan Mingo? I see Pinkney going to the PS for a season, but he will be pulled up if there is an injury--even if we stay healthy, in 2025, there will probably be two vacancies.  Not sure what Johnson is going to want $$$$, and Thielen will probably be done or cut.  Pinkney could then compete for a job, and with his height, he gives you that Tall red zone WR.   Worth keeping on the PS at the least.
    • I wouldn't you legit need 2-3 seasons too immediate post draft grades are one of the sports medias dumbest creations.
×
×
  • Create New...