Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It’s Official: Panthers getting new uniforms (color corrections)


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Here’s what will be changing (and not changing):

  • Silver will remain in the color scheme.
  • The current blue will be corrected to “process blue,” which is a similar shade to the end zones of Bank of America Stadium.
  • The shoulder stripes on jerseys will stop short of going under the armpit, accommodating a technological change made by Nike to maximize mobility.
  • The logo will remain as is.

uni changes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

Here’s what will be changing (and not changing):

  • Silver will remain in the color scheme.
  • The current blue will be corrected to “process blue,” which is a similar shade to the end zones of Bank of America Stadium.
  • The shoulder stripes on jerseys will stop short of going under the armpit, accommodating a technological change made by Nike to maximize mobility.
  • The logo will remain as is.

uni changes

I don't give a poo if nothing changes but can't we get anything with "process" out of the fugging building. Rhule is a skidmark in this franchise's history book. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Let's compromise and get Process Blue helmets then. 

Is the helmet considered part of the "uniform"? Hehe. 

Was hoping that we would lose the tiny numbers on the shoulders and fixing the trim on the shoulders, sleeves, pants, and helmet. Update the font/numbers and smooth/polish the logo a tiny bit. 

Maybe the 30-year anniversary will be the year we update. I mean....rounding off the jawline a decade ago and this process blue are about as deflating of uniform news anyone can expect. Especially knowing AZ is about to overhaul theirs. 

I'd compromise if Tepper is willing to bring back natural grass though. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, csx said:

Nothing to do with the team

Of course it does

It doesn't matter that the league decided to go with Nike over Reebok, once that change happened, the team should have forced Nike/NFL to make sure they can produce our proper team colors.

It's absurd to think that we just have to settle with what they had, this is the freaking NFL, there are 32 teams, don't make a deal with a uniform supplier if they can't deliver proper colors for those 32 teams.

Don't think for a second this has nothing to do with the team, if they wanted to, this would have been done for year 1, not that hard to force them to make our uniforms in the correct color scheme.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a hard time believing that Nike didn’t have packer green or Niner gold or cowboy blue that they wouldn’t have forced them to get in the shop and make the color

League should’ve dogged them on our behalf but like always, it’s us, so they don’t care

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Of course it does

It doesn't matter that the league decided to go with Nike over Reebok, once that change happened, the team should have forced Nike/NFL to make sure they can produce our proper team colors.

It's absurd to think that we just have to settle with what they had, this is the freaking NFL, there are 32 teams, don't make a deal with a uniform supplier if they can't deliver proper colors for those 32 teams.

Don't think for a second this has nothing to do with the team, if they wanted to, this would have been done for year 1, not that hard to force them to make our uniforms in the correct color scheme.

One would think that the capability to produce the proper colors for the 32 teams would have been part of the contract with Nike.  It's not like those colors were not known when the bids for the contract were being requested.  If Nike could not do that with the material they were proposing to use, then bid another material that can.  If they can't or do not want to do that, then thank you very much, better luck next time, next in line please.

It's a specification.....they can either produce something that meets it or they can't. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Growl said:

Have a hard time believing that Nike didn’t have packer green or Niner gold or cowboy blue that they wouldn’t have forced them to get in the shop and make the color

League should’ve dogged them on our behalf but like always, it’s us, so they don’t care

Right, which is exactly why in the end, it's kinda the team's fault because all they had to do was yell at the league and/or Nike and it would have been fixed years ago.

The team chooses our colors, now the manufacturer the league decides to give a contract to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tukafan21 said:

Of course it does

It doesn't matter that the league decided to go with Nike over Reebok, once that change happened, the team should have forced Nike/NFL to make sure they can produce our proper team colors.

It's absurd to think that we just have to settle with what they had, this is the freaking NFL, there are 32 teams, don't make a deal with a uniform supplier if they can't deliver proper colors for those 32 teams.

Don't think for a second this has nothing to do with the team, if they wanted to, this would have been done for year 1, not that hard to force them to make our uniforms in the correct color scheme.

It's got nothing to do with the team you just want to whine about color shades 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

image.thumb.jpeg.50b80ecbb260e010b36fbecf51107216.jpegGuy on twitter posted these this morning titled “Panthers 2023 Uniforms” it is BS but it does make me frustrated that all we are getting is a slight change and a color correction. 

Oh My God Wow GIF

Those would be AWESOME!!!!!  I was given a Luke Jersey for Christmas one year.  It's an official Nike version.  I can hardly wear it because there is so much vinyl on the sleeves that I cannot move my arms.  The Reebok ones were SOOOOOOOO much better!  I'm planning on getting one for our new QB or Burns, whoever's contract is longer!  I hope the fit (both literal and figurative) is improved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Soul Rebel said:

Is the helmet considered part of the "uniform"? Hehe. 

Was hoping that we would lose the tiny numbers on the shoulders and fixing the trim on the shoulders, sleeves, pants, and helmet. Update the font/numbers and smooth/polish the logo a tiny bit. 

Maybe the 30-year anniversary will be the year we update. I mean....rounding off the jawline a decade ago and this process blue are about as deflating of uniform news anyone can expect. Especially knowing AZ is about to overhaul theirs. 

I'd compromise if Tepper is willing to bring back natural grass though. 

Yeah, I was really hoping we would at least remove the tiny shoulder numbers 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...