Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL.com’s Lance Zierlein on Houston possibly trading up to #1


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Not that it will happen, but boy how sad would that be if a QB refused to play for the Panthers so they could play for the Texans.

Maybe when it was Matt Rhule, but with this staff there is no chance lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OldhamA said:

The Front Office still hasn't met to discuss which QB they want... yet judging by the talking heads in the media it's a done deal.

Crazy.

Thing is Tepper has made it very clear he wants a QB no if's, ands, or buts about it but he needs to stay clear of this. Till then let the HC, GM, and others that are involved in the drafting process do their job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, BriceYung9 said:

Lol I wish this was so but a lot of the most boisterous posters these days are anti young which is reminiscent of the 2011 choice in Cam and how they started to treat him prior to him showing he was more than capable. 

The loud anti young people are pro stroud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No it's not, there isn't a single coach who's only job is to win games, because no coach is going to win games unless they're also improving the quality of play out of their players. For coaches with contending teams, winning is their #1 job, but I think it's a more than reasonable take to say that coaches of not yet contending teams winning comes second to making your players better. We have 11 games left, if you gave me the option of winning all 11 of the games in terribly ugly fashion to where we don't improve the quality of our players vs we lose all 11 games, but do so in spectacular fashion where our players show significant improvement, I'm taking option B every time. Because option B is the path to future and long term success, while option A is a path to short term happiness at the expense of long term franchise stability.   And yes, that is clearly an extreme example that could never actually play out in either way, but you still know what I mean.  And no, it has nothing to do with draft position, it's about how good will these players be a year, 2 years, 3 years, etc, down the line, when you hope to be a true contending team, because nobody actually thinks we're that type of team this year unless you're literally crazy
    • Yeah if that's what we're signing up for here, then I just can't get behind it.  That contract extension that Hurney gave Jake that offseason was BRUTAL.
    • That's quite literally his only job. Every year has new goals, new identities, etc. But the one constant is to win at all costs. He isn't guaranteed to be here next year UNLESS he wins. Why would he give a poo to mold a bunch of players someone else might be coaching? 
×
×
  • Create New...