Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Glass half full thread for you miserable fugs. ITS DRAFT WEEK!!!!


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, onmyown said:

I prefer results. The man who hired/retained all those dumbass blunders is still here calling the shots. We are literally hoping he has learned, at the expense of fans, what other successful owners (and even arm chair GMs) already knew.

He is not backing off, so it’s clear he does not think he’s the issue, yet he is the common denominator. San Fran learned to back off and shockingly, they have success. We have to bank on Tepper either realizing that or actually call shots correctly.

Jury still out for me. We are undefeated off season champions since 1995. I’ll get exited when this team (and ownership) actually looks like it belongs in the NFL, which hasn’t happens for over half a decade.

Really! Richardson(RIP) is gone and Tepper is here to stay and he also has seemed to of changed his tune on how to run this organization and letting the right people do the jobs they were brought in to do.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

I'd forgotten about Byron Bell 

Haven't been this excited since Super Bowl 50 week 

Same. That game knocked all the wind out of my sails and I've been  struggling  to recover  ever since. 

I'm legit excited  again.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WUnderhill said:

It’s a rare opportunity to be able to get the #1 overall pick in a year in which there is a consensus #1 QB who is also the #1 prospect among all positions on many big boards. It’s a really great and exciting time for the team.

It is rare, which is why it hasn't happened this year either. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

It is rare, which is why it hasn't happened this year either. 

Weird, I just looked at literally the first 8 results when google searching “2023 NFL Draft Big Board” and here they are in order:

PFF: Young #1 overall prospect

Tankathon: Young #1 QB, #2 overall prospect

NFL.com (Jeremiah): Young #1 overall prospect

Fox Sports: Young #1 overall prospect

Draft Network: Young #1 QB, #4 overall prospect

Walter Football: Young #1 QB, #2 overall prospect

Sporting News: Young #1 overall prospect

ESPN: Young #1 overall prospect

Why even post such a verifiably incorrect response. This is supposed to be a positive thread.

  • Flames 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...