Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN lays off employees, with more cuts to come


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Charlotte has a pretty shitty infrastructure. It was not designed to be as big as it is becoming.

This is a North American city problem, though.  There's worse places for sure, but I agree with you, fwiw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

As a truck driver, I promise you it's better than most. 

As someone who lives in center city.... Chicago was way better... The fact they built uptown on a hill (why they call it uptown) and did not construct the city on a grid system, it is an actual poo show to navigate between boroughs... You have to go through the highway to get anywhere. They never planned for the city to grow how it has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Toker Smurf said:

Stand-alone streaming service (not ESPN+). 

You mean their own streaming service with all channels like a Sling, or Hulu or YouTube TV? One thing that pisses me off with streaming services is that they talked so long abit how much cheaper they were than cable but streaming services prices continue to shoot up to the point that it's not much cheaper than cable or satellite. I just dropped Sling due to it being something like $87 per month once I added a bunch of additional channels not counting any movie channels. I see most of the others are about the same proved as well once you add all the channels you want unfortunately. I hope Disney brings something out that beats all of them price wise but being that it's Disney and a bottle of water in one of their parks costs as much as a used car I won't hold my breath.

Disney Barks GIF

Edited by Ricky Prickles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/24/2023 at 4:05 PM, amcoolio said:

They gave Buck and Aikman 30 million a year combined and now I imagine will cut a lot of lower level employees making less than 200,000 to make up for it

I can't be the only one who hates listening to their self important drivel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/24/2023 at 5:41 PM, CamWhoaaCam said:

Speaking of Disney I heard on the radio today that Disney World might be coming to North Carolina. Nothing final but it's being considered as a real possibility.

 

My guess is somewhere out West with a lot of land would probably be the location. Asheville makes sense.

God no please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

As someone who lives in center city.... Chicago was way better... The fact they built uptown on a hill (why they call it uptown) and did not construct the city on a grid system, it is an actual poo show to navigate between boroughs... You have to go through the highway to get anywhere. They never planned for the city to grow how it has.

Atlanta is worse in that aspect. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/24/2023 at 7:10 PM, jayboogieman said:

Won't happen. Disney all but owns Florida and is that state's single biggest source of income. It's just a publicity stunt by some of the state reps along with trying to milk 750000 from the state to "perform a study on the feasibility of getting Disney."

There is another reason Disney would no bs consider the move. If the science says there's a meaningful chance Florida is underwater from climate change down the road, forget all the nonsense political noise from both sides, do you really think a company as big as Disney doesn't take a serious look at relocating their major park to avoid that risk?

If they relocate to the mountains of NC, it would be telling. The cheapest, flatest land best suited for a major theme park by far isn't in the mountains, it's in the eastern part of the state. Compared to large chunks of eastern NC, Asheville is neither flat nor cheap, and building large roads to and from any relocated park would be much more expensive projects than in flat easter NC. But if Disney goes to the mountains, what does that tell you about what they believe might happen?

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

There is another reason Disney would no bs consider the move. If the science says there's a meaningful chance Florida is underwater from climate change down the road, forget all the nonsense political noise from both sides, do you really think a company as big as Disney doesn't take a serious look at relocating their major park to avoid that risk?

If they relocate to the mountains of NC, it would be telling. The cheapest, flatest land best suited for a major theme park by far isn't in the mountains, it's in the eastern part of the state. Compared to large chunks of eastern NC, Asheville is neither flat nor cheap, and building large roads to and from any relocated park would be much more expensive projects than in flat easter NC. But if Disney goes to the mountains, what does that tell you about what they believe might happen?

If Disney moved because of the climate, they would go further north than NC because they had seen studies that showed NC would become too hot and dry and they wouldn't want to move again. If Disney moved to NC at all, it wouldn't be the mountains but somewhere in the piedmont. There's not enough land in the mountains for a park Disney World's size. Virginia, southern Ohio, southern Indiana, or Kentucky would be my guess if Disney left Florida due to the climate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just going off the draft sims and he's always sitting around 20 lol. First year in a while where we haven't been thinking about the draft already in late October so haven't really looked into the top 15-20 picks yet. Also the qb class is super weak so he probably will sneak up into 10-15
    • I fully expect them to pick up his 5th year , and they're waiting for him to put a full excellent consistent season of QB play in year 4 or 5. If that don't happen,  they'll eventually cut ties.  Here's to hoping he just goes on a team in 2026. The worst thing he could do is continue to see-saw us to around .500 records because it might be impossible to replace him at that point unless youre willing to do the veteran qb carousel poo we did from 2019 to 2023.   
    • What do you think of Bryce Youngs career thus far? Are you excited about his progress or is it not enough for you? I included a poll of ranking his performance through 3 years thus far.  I personally think he's made some decent progress. Has had some high moments (last half of 2024, Rams game, ATL game in 2025)  but in my mind, those are still outweighed by the many more lowlights thus far (ex turnovers, missed throws, poor decisions)  It's a very mixed bag for me. He's done enough to get a 5th year option but by no means should we lock him in with a 50+ mil a year multi year deal. I want to see him play consistently well for a full year before that happens (yes, I'm still saying that going into year 4. That might be telling).  Just sucks when you see CJ Stroud, Jayden Daniel's, Caleb Williams almost immediately lighting poo up with their arm talent. Maybe Bryce is just an ultra slow burn. I don't know what to think anymore. Guess we're gonna be stuck with him for a whilr unless we end up being bad enough to earn a high pick next year. I doubted it lol. Overall Stats for his career:       ● 14 W - 30L (regular season)       ● 0-1 playoffs record        ● 61.4% completion, 8291 passing yards, 49 TDs, 30 INTs  Year 1:       ● 2 wins, 14 losses      ● 60% completion rate, 2877 passing yards, 11 TD to 10 INTs, 5.5 yards per attempted pass Year 2:        ● 4 wins , 8 losses        ● 60.9% completion rate,  2403 passing yards, 15 TD, 9 INTs,  6.3 yards per attempted pass  Year 3:        ● 8 Wins, 8 Losses         ● 63.6% competition rate, 3011 passing yards, 23 TDs to 11 INTs  Playoffs         ● 1 game in year 3 ( 0 - 1 in playoffs)         ● 21/40 (52.5% completion rate), 264 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT. 
×
×
  • Create New...